Skip to content

GLNK vs THYP

Grayscale Chainlink Trust Link

GLNKBNYSE Arca

21Shares Hyperliquid ETF

THYPANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

THYP −0.05pt a year

GLNK0.35%THYP0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GLNK 5.1×the volume

GLNK412KTHYP80.9K

GLNK vs THYP Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.8%GLNK+73.7%THYP

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GLNK +35.8%. THYP +73.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%60%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLNK 0.35%
THYP 0.30%, better
Fund size
GLNK $141M
THYP $66M
1Y total return
GLNK −59.6%
THYP No data
Holdings
GLNK 1
THYP 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLNK 412K sh, better
THYP 80.9K sh
NAV per share
GLNK $9.84
THYP $52.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLNK: Cost 48, Risk 7, Mission 88, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 83. THYP: Cost 86, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 45, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLNK, THYP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLNKTHYP
Cost30% weightC48A86Higher
Mission25% weightA88Not scored
Risk15% weightF7A77Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherA72
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC45
Durability5% weightA83HigherC41

Rank among Crypto Spot funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GLNK and THYP are both graded against the same 25 Crypto Spot funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Crypto Spot⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

THYP ranks 3rd and GLNK 12th of 25 funds in the Crypto Spot Category.

  1. Rank 1AXRPZFranklin XRP ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AHYPGGrayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3ATHYP21Shares Hyperliquid ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AXRPBitwise XRP ETFScore 75
  5. Rank 11BGDOGGrayscale Dogecoin Trust ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 12BGLNKGrayscale Chainlink Trust LinkScore 59
  7. Rank 12BTDOT21shares Polkadot ETF Shares of Beneficial InterestScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLNKBGrayscale Chainlink Trust Link

THYPA21Shares Hyperliquid ETF

In short

GLNK Grayscale's LINK vehicle began life as a 2021 private trust and became the first US spot Chainlink product to trade on an exchange. One job: hold LINK, let the share price follow it, no leverage and no derivatives.

THYP The first US spot ETF for HYPE, the token behind the Hyperliquid perpetuals exchange. It holds the coin directly, stakes a slice of it, and charges less than the typical spot-crypto fund.

Stated mandate

GLNK The Trust passively seeks to have its shares reflect the value of LINK held by the Trust, less expenses and liabilities. It does not seek returns beyond tracking LINK and does not use leverage or derivatives.

THYP The Trust seeks to track HYPE's performance through the FTSE Hyperliquid Index, net of expenses and liabilities, and may reflect staking rewards at the Sponsor's discretion.

Why people hold it

  • GLNK One job, plainly stated: passively reflect the value of the LINK it holds, less expenses. No leverage, no derivatives, no side bets.
  • The first US spot Chainlink product to reach an exchange, backed by a trust that has been reporting since its 2021 debut in private-placement form.decrypt.co
  • LINK exposure arrives through a NYSE Arca ticker in an ordinary brokerage account: no wallet, no seed phrase, no crypto exchange login.globenewswire.com
  • Sits in the upper half of its spot-crypto peer group, with liquidity that holds up for everyday retail-size trades.
  • THYP First US-listed spot Hyperliquid ETF: HYPE exposure inside an ordinary brokerage account, with no wallet, no private keys and no crypto exchange login.21shares.com
  • Staking is built into the wrapper. A portion of the trust's HYPE is staked on the network, and rewards are passed to shareholders in cash rather than kept inside the token.21shares.com
  • The 0.30% sponsor fee sits below the 0.35% median for spot-crypto ETFs and under BHYP, which tracks the same FTSE Hyperliquid Index.
  • Coins are held by Anchorage Digital Bank and BitGo Bank & Trust, federally chartered trust banks built for digital assets.21shares.com

Worth knowing

  • GLNK One token, no cushion. Everything here rides on Chainlink's price, and crypto drawdowns tend to be deep and fast.
  • It is a grantor trust, not a 1940 Act fund, so the regulations and protections that come with registered ETFs and mutual funds do not apply.globenewswire.com
  • At 0.35% it is not the price leader: Bitwise's CLNK lists at 0.34% for the same token, and several spot-crypto rivals such as TSUI and TDOT sit at 0.30%.
  • THYP One token, one protocol. Value moves with the price of HYPE, the native asset of a young derivatives exchange, so drawdowns can be deep and fast.decrypt.co
  • Launched in 2026, so there is little history to judge it by, and how much of the HYPE gets staked is set at the sponsor's discretion.
  • It is a grantor trust, not a registered investment company, so the shareholder protections that come with 1940 Act funds do not apply here.

Full GLNK profile⁠

Full THYP profile⁠

GLNK vs THYP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GLNK vs THYP Cost

Overpaying GLNK vs THYP

$977

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GLNK 0.35%

    $7,126

  • THYP 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GLNK 0.35%
  • THYP 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GLNK $7,126THYP $6,149

Year by year

YearGLNKTHYPOverpaying
10$634$545$89
20$2,454$2,113$341
30$7,126$6,149$977

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%GLNK
  • 0.30%THYP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Crypto Spot funds
  • Median 0.35%

THYP 3rd cheapest of 25 funds

GLNK 11th cheapest of 25 funds

GLNK vs THYP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLNK None
THYP No data
Last payment
GLNK No data
THYP $0.19
Ex-dividend
GLNK No data
THYP Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
GLNK No data
THYP Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
GLNK No data
THYP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

GLNKAll GLNK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

THYPQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll THYP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2026 $0.04; Sep 29, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

GLNK vs THYP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLNK 160.9%THYP No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLNK 0.45THYP No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLNK −96.3%since May 2022THYP No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GLNK 4.04THYP −0.29

GLNK and THYP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GLNKBvsXRPZA

    Grayscale Chainlink Trust Link · Franklin XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THYPAvsXRPZA

    21Shares Hyperliquid ETF · Franklin XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLNKBvsHYPGA

    Grayscale Chainlink Trust Link · Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THYPAvsHYPGA

    21Shares Hyperliquid ETF · Grayscale Hyperliquid Staking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLNKBvsXRPA

    Grayscale Chainlink Trust Link · Bitwise XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THYPAvsXRPA

    21Shares Hyperliquid ETF · Bitwise XRP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.