Skip to content

GOGL vs KTUP

Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF

GOGLCCboe

T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF

KTUPDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GOGL −1.30pt a year

GOGL0.20%KTUP1.50%

Avg volume · 30D

KTUP 18.0×the volume

GOGL18.9KKTUP341K

GOGL vs KTUP Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−42.4%GOGL−34.2%KTUP

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. GOGL −42.4%. KTUP −34.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%25%50%75%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GOGL 0.20%, better
KTUP 1.50%
Fund size
GOGL $4M
KTUP $11M
1Y total return
GOGL No data
KTUP −90.6%
Holdings
GOGL 1
KTUP 3
Avg volume (30D)
GOGL 18.9K sh
KTUP 341K sh, better
NAV per share
GOGL $15.14
KTUP $3.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GOGL: Cost 99, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 36. KTUP: Cost 11, Risk 28, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GOGL, KTUP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGOGLKTUP
Cost30% weightA99HigherF11
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherD28
Tradability15% weightC45C45
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD36B64Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GOGL and KTUP are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

GOGL ranks 123rd and KTUP 291st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 123CGMECCorgi GME 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  2. Rank 123CGOGLCorgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 123CGOOLLeverage Shares 2X Long GOOGL Daily ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 289DSBTUT-REX 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETFScore 27
  5. Rank 291DKTUPT-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETFScore 26
  6. Rank 291DRGTXDaily Target 2X Long RGTI ETFScore 26

GOGL vs KTUP Holdings

How GOGL and KTUP differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of KTUP.

Level by level

  • Asset classLeveraged/Inverse, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for GOGL and KTUP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for GOGL.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GOGL199.3%
  • KTUP212.2%

Securities held

  • GOGL0
  • KTUP1

Asset class

GOGL
Leveraged/Inverse
KTUP
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GOGL0
  • In both0
  • Only in KTUP1

Only in GOGL

0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight

Only in KTUP

1 security, 11.8% of KTUP by weight

  • First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X11.78%

Weight gaps

GOGL and KTUP share no securities.

All 1 GOGL holdings⁠All 4 KTUP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GOGL vs KTUP Cost

Overpaying KTUP vs GOGL

$22,128

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GOGL 0.20%

    $4,155

  • KTUP 1.50%

    $26,283

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GOGL 0.20%
  • KTUP 1.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530KTUP $26,283GOGL $4,155

Year by year

YearGOGLKTUPOverpaying
10$365$2,590$2,225
20$1,421$9,519$8,098
30$4,155$26,283$22,128

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
  • 1.50%KTUP
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

GOGL cheapest of 315 funds

KTUP 271st cheapest of 315 funds

GOGL vs KTUP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
GOGL None
KTUP No data
Last payment
GOGL No data
KTUP $0.49
Ex-dividend
GOGL No data
KTUP Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
GOGL No data
KTUP Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
GOGL No data
KTUP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GOGLAll GOGL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KTUPIrregular · 1 paymentAll KTUP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2025 $0.49. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

GOGL vs KTUP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GOGL No dataKTUP 104.6%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GOGL No dataKTUP −1.52since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GOGL No dataKTUP −95.1%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GOGL −3.37KTUP 2.01

Popular comparisons

  • GOGLCvsTSMGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KTUPDvsTSMGA

    T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOGLCvsUNHGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KTUPDvsUNHGA

    T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOGLCvsOKTGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KTUPDvsOKTGA

    T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.