Skip to content
etf.net

GOGL vs MIC

Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF

GOGLCCboe

Corgi MU 2x Daily ETF

MICCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GOGL −0.25pt a year

GOGL0.20%MIC0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

GOGL 1.5×the volume

GOGL24.7KMIC16.6K

GOGL vs MIC Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−37.7%GOGL−40.3%MIC

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. GOGL −37.7%. MIC −40.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GOGL 0.20%, better
MIC 0.45%
Fund size
GOGL $4M
MIC $1M
Holdings
GOGL 1
MIC 1
Avg volume (30D)
GOGL 24.7K sh, better
MIC 16.6K sh
NAV per share
GOGL $15.61
MIC $6.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GOGL: Cost 99, Risk 69, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 34. MIC: Cost 88, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings not scored, Durability 28.
Pillar letters and Scores for GOGL, MIC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGOGLMIC
Cost30% weightA99HigherA88
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB69HigherC42
Tradability15% weightC48HigherD36
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD34HigherD28

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GOGL and MIC are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 312 funds
See all 312 ›

GOGL ranks 124th and MIC 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 124CGMECCorgi GME 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  2. Rank 124CGOGLCorgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 124CGOOLLeverage Shares 2X Long GOOGL Daily ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 124CMHXCorgi MARA 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 124CMICCorgi MU 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 124CMNSXCorgi MNST 2x Daily ETFScore 40

GOGL vs MIC Holdings

How GOGL and MIC differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: GOGL gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

MIC gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classLeveraged/Inverse100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for GOGL and MIC.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GOGL and MIC, widest gap first
CountryMore in GOGLMore in MICGap
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GOGL199.5%
  • MIC198.6%

Securities held

  • GOGL0
  • MIC0

Asset class

GOGL
Leveraged/Inverse
MIC
Leveraged/Inverse

Holdings

  • Only in GOGL0
  • In both0
  • Only in MIC0

Only in GOGL

0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight

Only in MIC

0 securities, 0.0% of MIC by weight

Weight gaps

GOGL and MIC share no securities.

All 1 GOGL holdings⁠All 1 MIC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GOGL vs MIC Cost

Overpaying MIC vs GOGL

$4,886

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GOGL 0.20%

    $4,155

  • MIC 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GOGL 0.20%
  • MIC 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MIC $9,041GOGL $4,155

Year by year

YearGOGLMICOverpaying
10$365$812$447
20$1,421$3,128$1,707
30$4,155$9,041$4,886

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
  • 0.45%MIC
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

GOGL cheapest of 312 funds

MIC 7th cheapest of 312 funds

GOGL vs MIC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GOGL None
MIC None

Distribution history

GOGLAll GOGL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MICAll MIC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GOGL vs MIC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GOGL −3.37MIC 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • GOGLCvsUNHGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MICCvsUNHGA

    Corgi MU 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOGLCvsTSMGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MICCvsTSMGA

    Corgi MU 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOGLCvsCOTGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MICCvsCOTGA

    Corgi MU 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.