Skip to content
etf.net

GOGL vs NTAL

Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF

GOGLCCboe

GraniteShares 2x Long NTAP Daily ETF

NTALCNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GOGL −1.30pt a year

GOGL0.20%NTAL1.50%

Avg volume · 30D

GOGL 3.7×the volume

GOGL18.9KNTAL5.1K

GOGL vs NTAL Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−41.9%GOGL+15.0%NTAL

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GOGL −41.9%. NTAL +15.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%75%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GOGL 0.20%, better
NTAL 1.50%
Fund size
GOGL $4M
NTAL $1M
Holdings
GOGL 1
NTAL 2
Avg volume (30D)
GOGL 18.9K sh, better
NTAL 5.1K sh
NAV per share
GOGL $15.14
NTAL $40.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GOGL: Cost 99, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 37. NTAL: Cost 11, Risk 87, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings not scored, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for GOGL, NTAL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGOGLNTAL
Cost30% weightA99HigherF11
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66A87Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B56Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD37D38Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GOGL and NTAL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

GOGL ranks 123rd and NTAL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 123CGMECCorgi GME 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  2. Rank 123CGOGLCorgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  3. Rank 123CGOOLLeverage Shares 2X Long GOOGL Daily ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 123CNOWXCorgi NOW 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 123CNTALGraniteShares 2x Long NTAP Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 123CNVOCCorgi NVO 2x Daily ETFScore 40

GOGL vs NTAL Holdings

How GOGL and NTAL differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of NTAL.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classLeveraged/Inverse100%

Sector

No Sector split for GOGL and NTAL.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for GOGL.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GOGL199.4%
  • NTAL100.0%

Securities held

  • GOGL0
  • NTAL1

Asset class

GOGL
Leveraged/Inverse
NTAL
Leveraged/Inverse

Holdings

  • Only in GOGL0
  • In both0
  • Only in NTAL1

Only in GOGL

0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight

Only in NTAL

1 security, 66.7% of NTAL by weight

  • Ntap66.68%

Weight gaps

GOGL and NTAL share no securities.

All 1 GOGL holdings⁠All NTAL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GOGL vs NTAL Cost

Overpaying NTAL vs GOGL

$22,128

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GOGL 0.20%

    $4,155

  • NTAL 1.50%

    $26,283

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GOGL 0.20%
  • NTAL 1.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530NTAL $26,283GOGL $4,155

Year by year

YearGOGLNTALOverpaying
10$365$2,590$2,225
20$1,421$9,519$8,098
30$4,155$26,283$22,128

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
  • 1.50%NTAL
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

GOGL cheapest of 315 funds

NTAL 271st cheapest of 315 funds

GOGL vs NTAL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GOGL None
NTAL None

Distribution history

GOGLAll GOGL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NTALAll NTAL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GOGL vs NTAL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GOGL −3.37NTAL 1.18

Popular comparisons

  • GOGLCvsTSMGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NTALCvsTSMGA

    GraniteShares 2x Long NTAP Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOGLCvsUNHGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NTALCvsUNHGA

    GraniteShares 2x Long NTAP Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOGLCvsOKTGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NTALCvsOKTGA

    GraniteShares 2x Long NTAP Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.