QCML ranks 111th and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs QCML
0.0%by weight
GOGL −1.33pt a year
0.20%1.53%
QCML 88.7×the volume
18.9K1.68M
GOGL vs QCML Performance
−41.9%+15.1%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- QCML 1.53%
- GOGL $4M
- QCML $45M
- GOGL
- QCML −41.9%
- GOGL 1
- QCML 2
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- QCML 1.68M sh, better
- GOGL $15.14
- QCML $18.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | QCML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C45 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D37 | A77Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and QCML are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
QCMLC
In short
QCML Two times Qualcomm's move, one day at a time. QCML never owns a QCOM share: it rents the exposure through swaps, resets every night, and costs 1.50% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026 (7.39% gross).
Stated mandate
QCML The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Qualcomm Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs QCML Holdings
How GOGL and QCML differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of QCML.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL and QCML.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- GOGL199.4%
- QCML100.0%
- GOGL0
- QCML1
Asset class
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- QCML
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in GOGL0
- In both0
- Only in QCML1
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Only in QCML
1 security, 66.7% of QCML by weight
- Qcom66.67%
Weight gaps
GOGL and QCML share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs QCML Cost
Overpaying QCML vs GOGL
$22,551
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
QCML 1.53%
$26,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | QCML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $2,639 | $2,274 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $9,685 | $8,264 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $26,706 | $22,551 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 1.53%QCML
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
QCML 301st cheapest of 315 funds
GOGL vs QCML Dividends
- GOGL None
- QCML None
Distribution history
GOGL vs QCML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GOGL QCML 117.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GOGL QCML 0.25
- Worst fall
- GOGL QCML −68.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37QCML 6.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.53% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.53% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.53% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.