Skip to content

GOGL vs UUUG

Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF

GOGLCCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long UUUU Daily ETF

UUUGCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GOGL −0.55pt a year

GOGL0.20%UUUG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

UUUG 23.6×the volume

GOGL18.9KUUUG446K

GOGL vs UUUG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−41.9%GOGL−61.2%UUUG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GOGL −41.9%. UUUG −61.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%50%75%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GOGL 0.20%, better
UUUG 0.75%
Fund size
GOGL $4M
UUUG $6M
Holdings
GOGL 1
UUUG 5
Avg volume (30D)
GOGL 18.9K sh
UUUG 446K sh, better
NAV per share
GOGL $15.14
UUUG $1.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GOGL: Cost 99, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 37. UUUG: Cost 70, Risk 24, Mission 80, Tradability 53, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for GOGL, UUUG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGOGLUUUG
Cost30% weightA99HigherA70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB66HigherF24
Tradability15% weightC45C53Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD37C49Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GOGL and UUUG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

UUUG ranks 76th and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 76CUBRLGraniteShares 2x Long Uber Daily ETFScore 53
  2. Rank 76CUUUGLeverage Shares 2x Long UUUU Daily ETFScore 53
  3. Rank 78CBABXGraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 123CGMECCorgi GME 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 123CGOGLCorgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 123CGOOLLeverage Shares 2X Long GOOGL Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GOGLCCorgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF

UUUGCLeverage Shares 2x Long UUUU Daily ETF

In short

GOGL No data

UUUG Two times the daily move of Energy Fuels, the US company producing both uranium and rare earths. Priced at 0.75%, under the 2x single-stock median, with the exposure reset every trading day.

Stated mandate

GOGL No data

UUUG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of UUUU, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

GOGL No data

  • UUUG At 0.75%, it undercuts the typical 2x single-stock fund (median 1.01%) and the 0.96% Direxion charges on peers like GGLL and AAPU.
  • Unusual underlying. Energy Fuels produces uranium and rare earth oxides, a corner of US critical materials few single-stock ETFs reach.energyfuels.com
  • Tracks its stated 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations in a crowded field of 2x bull single-stock funds.

Worth knowing

GOGL No data

  • UUUG The daily reset compounds. Hold through a choppy stretch and the result can sit far from 2x the stock's move over that whole period.
  • One stock, doubled. Uranium and rare earth names swing hard, and the 2x multiple amplifies drops as much as gains.
  • Launched in 2026 and moderately traded, so the track record is short and spreads can widen when the underlying gets rough.

Full GOGL profile⁠

Full UUUG profile⁠

GOGL vs UUUG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GOGL vs UUUG Cost

Overpaying UUUG vs GOGL

$10,327

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GOGL 0.20%

    $4,155

  • UUUG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GOGL 0.20%
  • UUUG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530UUUG $14,482GOGL $4,155

Year by year

YearGOGLUUUGOverpaying
10$365$1,336$971
20$1,421$5,078$3,657
30$4,155$14,482$10,327

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
  • 0.75%UUUG
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

GOGL cheapest of 315 funds

UUUG 87th cheapest of 315 funds

GOGL vs UUUG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GOGL None
UUUG None

Distribution history

GOGLAll GOGL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UUUGAll UUUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GOGL vs UUUG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GOGL −3.37UUUG 3.79

Popular comparisons

  • GOGLCvsTSMGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UUUGCvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long UUUU Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOGLCvsUNHGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UUUGCvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long UUUU Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOGLCvsOKTGA

    Corgi GOOGL 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UUUGCvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long UUUU Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.