IVVW ranks 2nd and GQI 6th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
GQI vs IVVW
IVVW −0.09pt a year
0.34%0.25%
IVVW 1.7×the volume
24.2K41.5K
GQI vs IVVW Performance
+15.3%+12.9%
- GQI 0.34%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- GQI $306M
- IVVW $348M
- GQI +15.3%, better
- IVVW +12.9%
- GQI 9.46%
- IVVW 18.63%, better
- GQI 123
- IVVW 506
- GQI 24.2K sh
- IVVW 41.5K sh, better
- GQI $59.84
- IVVW $44.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GQI | IVVW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | C48 | A77Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A72Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. GQI and IVVW are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GQIA
IVVWA
In short
GQI Most S&P 500 income funds sell calls against the whole book. GQI writes options on half its equity, leaves the other half unencumbered, screens its stocks for quality, and pays monthly.
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
Stated mandate
GQI The Fund seeks current income with capital-appreciation potential. It invests in diversified high-quality U.S. common stocks and uses an options-selling overlay on 50% of the equity portfolio to support monthly cash distributions, enhance return, and reduce downside risk.
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GQI vs IVVW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GQI vs IVVW Cost
Overpaying GQI vs IVVW
$1,773
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GQI 0.34%
$6,932
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GQI | IVVW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $455 | $161 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $1,769 | $617 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $5,159 | $1,773 |
- 0.34%GQI
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
GQI 10th cheapest of 51 funds
GQI vs IVVW Dividends
- GQI 9.46%
- IVVW 18.63%, better
- GQI $5.63
- IVVW $8.25
- GQI $0.36
- IVVW $0.88
- GQI Nov 2, 2026
- IVVW Oct 2, 2026
- GQI Pays Nov 3, 2026
- IVVW Oct 7, 2026
- GQI Monthly
- IVVW Monthly
Distribution history
GQI vs IVVW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GQI 8.8%IVVW 7.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GQI 1.20IVVW 1.10
- Worst fall
- GQI −16.5%IVVW −16.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GQI 0.71IVVW 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.