TCAL ranks 1st and GRNI 27th of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.
GRNI vs TCAL
TCAL −0.65pt a year
0.99%0.34%
TCAL 2.8×the volume
28.2K79.2K
GRNI vs TCAL Performance
+5.1%+10.0%
- GRNI 0.99%
- TCAL 0.34%, better
- GRNI $52M
- TCAL $321M
- GRNI
- TCAL +10.8%
- GRNI
- TCAL 11.55%
- GRNI 89
- TCAL 106
- GRNI 28.2K sh
- TCAL 79.2K sh, better
- GRNI $18.91
- TCAL $23.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GRNI | TCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F12 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A83 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A84Higher |
Rank among Active Option Income funds
Same Category. GRNI and TCAL are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GRNIC
TCALA
In short
GRNI Fundstrat's Granny Shots research brand, wrapped in an options-income ETF. Active US large caps up top, an options overlay for cash below, Treasuries in the mix. Income is the stated first job here; appreciation is the second.
TCAL An active stock picker's take on the covered-call trade: roughly 70 hand-chosen holdings, calls written on top, cash paid out monthly, all for 0.34% a year.
Stated mandate
GRNI The actively managed fund primarily seeks current income through options strategies and secondarily seeks long-term capital appreciation from U.S. large-cap equities, while maintaining cash or U.S. Treasuries.
TCAL The fund seeks regular distributions while aiming to preserve capital and potentially achieve capital appreciation. It invests in equities and writes covered calls to generate cash flow alongside dividends.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GRNI vs TCAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GRNI vs TCAL Cost
Overpaying GRNI vs TCAL
$11,593
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GRNI 0.99%
$18,525
TCAL 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GRNI | TCAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $616 | $1,130 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $2,386 | $4,179 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $6,932 | $11,593 |
- 0.99%GRNI
- 0.34%TCAL, cheaper
- Middle half of Active Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
TCAL 2nd cheapest of 50 funds
GRNI 29th cheapest of 50 funds
GRNI vs TCAL Dividends
- GRNI
- TCAL 11.55%
- GRNI
- TCAL $2.71
- GRNI $0.17
- TCAL $0.26
- GRNI Oct 29, 2026
- TCAL Oct 30, 2026
- GRNI Oct 30, 2026
- TCAL Nov 3, 2026
- GRNI Monthly
- TCAL Monthly
Distribution history
GRNI vs TCAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GRNI TCAL 9.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- GRNI TCAL 0.24
- Worst fall
- GRNI TCAL −7.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GRNI 0.92TCAL 0.20
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.