Skip to content

GRPM vs ILCV

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF

GRPMCNYSE Arca

iShares Morningstar Value ETF

ILCVANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.1%by weight

Expense ratio

ILCV −0.31pt a year

GRPM0.35%ILCV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

ILCV 1.6×the volume

GRPM15.4KILCV24.4K

10Y return · a year

GRPM +0.1pt

GRPM+12.6%ILCV+12.5%

GRPM vs ILCV Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+59.6%GRPM+79.6%ILCV

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. GRPM +59.6%. ILCV +79.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GRPM 0.35%
ILCV 0.04%, better
Fund size
GRPM $614M
ILCV $1.37B
1Y total return
GRPM +24.2%, better
ILCV +20.9%
Yield (12M)
GRPM 0.53%
ILCV 1.51%, better
Holdings
GRPM 62
ILCV 375
Avg volume (30D)
GRPM 15.4K sh
ILCV 24.4K sh, better
NAV per share
GRPM $144.57
ILCV $109.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GRPM: Cost 42, Risk 39, Mission 79, Tradability 39, Holdings 47, Durability 68. ILCV: Cost 99, Risk 90, Mission 82, Tradability 64, Holdings 39, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for GRPM, ILCV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGRPMILCV
Cost30% weightC42A99Higher
Mission25% weightA79A82Higher
Risk15% weightD39A90Higher
Tradability15% weightD39B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC47HigherD39
Durability5% weightB68A82Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GRPM and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

ILCV ranks 2nd and GRPM 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 56CFNXFirst Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX FundScore 52
  5. Rank 56CGRPMInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 56CQGRWWisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth FundScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GRPMCInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF

ILCVAiShares Morningstar Value ETF

In short

GRPM Take the S&P MidCap 400, then keep only the roughly 60 names that clear a growth-at-a-reasonable-price screen. GRPM is the stock-picker's cut of a midcap index fund, run by rules instead of a manager.

ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.

Stated mandate

GRPM The Fund invests at least 90% of its assets in securities comprising the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index. The index targets companies with fundamental growth, reasonable valuations, financial strength and earning power.

ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.

Why people hold it

  • GRPM Screens a 400-stock midcap universe down to about 60 names on growth, valuation, financial strength and earning power. A real bet, not a benchmark in disguise.invesco.com
  • Rules, not vibes: at least 90% of assets sit in S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index constituents, and the fund has hugged that index closely.invesco.com
  • The odd one out among plain S&P 400 trackers like SPMD, IJH and IVOO: same universe, factor screen bolted on. Invesco has run the ticker since 2010.
  • ILCV Charges 0.04% a year against a 0.32% median for its factor peer group. Undercuts well-regarded rivals like VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Value gets defined five ways: forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow and dividend yield. Wider lens than a single price-to-book screen.ishares.com
  • Spreads the bet across about 400 large- and mid-cap names and distributes quarterly.
  • Trading since 2004 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it ranks among the strongest implementations in its factor cohort.

Worth knowing

  • GRPM The screen costs money: 0.35% a year versus a 0.15% category median, and vanilla access to the same 400 stocks runs 0.03% at SPMD, 0.05% at IJH.
  • Thinly traded next to the giants in its category, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads and more slippage on size.
  • About 60 holdings means individual names swing the outcome, and the fund can diverge widely from the broad midcap 400 in either direction.
  • ILCV One of the quieter tickers in its category. Thin volume means spreads matter more here than on a mega-cap index fund, and limit orders are the usual tool.
  • Value-only by design. It skips the market's priciest growth leaders, so it moves differently from a total-market fund in both directions.ishares.com
  • Large and mid caps only. Small-cap value sits outside the mandate.

Full GRPM profile⁠

Full ILCV profile⁠

GRPM vs ILCV Holdings

How GRPM and ILCV differ

Overlap by weight

0.1%

Shared holdings make up 5.8% of GRPM and 0.1% of ILCV.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both0.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors79.4%
  • Countryby domicile97.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in GRPM and ILCV, widest gap first
SectorMore in GRPMMore in ILCV
CommunicationILCV +8.8 points
Health CareGRPM +7.0 points
Consumer StaplesILCV +5.0 points
FinancialsGRPM +4.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryGRPM +4.4 points
IndustrialsGRPM +3.4 points
UtilitiesILCV +3.0 points
Real EstateILCV +1.7 points
EnergyILCV +1.6 points
MaterialsGRPM +1.5 points
TechnologyILCV +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GRPM and ILCV, widest gap first
CountryMore in GRPMMore in ILCV
United StatesILCV +2.3 points
BrazilGRPM +1.9 points
SwedenGRPM +1.1 points
Other countries (4)ILCV +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GRPM27.0%
  • ILCV34.2%

Securities held

  • GRPM61
  • ILCV372

Asset class

GRPM
Equity
ILCV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GRPM58
  • In both3
  • Only in ILCV369

Only in GRPM

58 securities, 94.2% of GRPM by weight

  • Abercrombie & Fitch Co3.69%
  • Halozyme Therapeutics Inc3.40%
  • SharkNinja Inc2.59%

Only in ILCV

369 securities, 99.7% of ILCV by weight

  • Microsoft8.36%
  • Apple7.18%
  • Amazon.com Inc3.05%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GRPM and ILCV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GRPMMore in ILCV
Tenet Healthcare CorpTHCGRPM +2.11 points
TechnipFMC PLCFTIGRPM +1.96 points
United Therapeutics CorpUTHRGRPM +1.57 points

All 61 GRPM holdings⁠All 372 ILCV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GRPM vs ILCV Cost

Overpaying GRPM vs ILCV

$6,277

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GRPM 0.35%

    $7,126

  • ILCV 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GRPM 0.35%
  • ILCV 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GRPM $7,126ILCV $849

Year by year

YearGRPMILCVOverpaying
10$634$73$561
20$2,454$288$2,166
30$7,126$849$6,277

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%GRPM
  • 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

ILCV cheapest of 99 funds

GRPM 56th cheapest of 99 funds

GRPM vs ILCV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GRPM 0.53%
ILCV 1.51%, better
Payout (12M)
GRPM $0.78
ILCV $1.65
Last payment
GRPM $0.15
ILCV $0.42
Ex-dividend
GRPM Sep 21, 2026
ILCV Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
GRPM Sep 25, 2026
ILCV Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
GRPM Quarterly
ILCV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GRPMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll GRPM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.19; Jun 16, 2017 $0.15; Sep 15, 2017 $0.17; Dec 15, 2017 $0.23; Mar 16, 2018 $0.19; Jun 15, 2018 $0.20; Sep 24, 2018 $0.26; Dec 24, 2018 $0.19; Mar 18, 2019 $0.20; Jun 24, 2019 $0.23; Sep 23, 2019 $0.22; Dec 23, 2019 $0.19; Mar 23, 2020 $0.34; Jun 22, 2020 $0.16; Sep 21, 2020 $0.19; Dec 21, 2020 $0.19; Mar 22, 2021 $0.24; Jun 21, 2021 $0.19; Sep 20, 2021 $0.25; Dec 20, 2021 $0.20; Mar 21, 2022 $0.27; Jun 21, 2022 $0.27; Sep 19, 2022 $0.32; Dec 19, 2022 $0.21; Mar 20, 2023 $0.30; Jun 20, 2023 $0.31; Sep 18, 2023 $0.15; Dec 18, 2023 $0.19; Mar 18, 2024 $0.28; Jun 24, 2024 $0.30; Sep 23, 2024 $0.29; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Mar 24, 2025 $0.41; Jun 23, 2025 $0.49; Sep 22, 2025 $0.32; Dec 22, 2025 $0.22; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.20; Sep 21, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
ILCVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll ILCV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.28; Jun 27, 2017 $0.30; Sep 26, 2017 $0.31; Dec 19, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.33; Jun 26, 2018 $0.35; Sep 26, 2018 $0.34; Dec 17, 2018 $0.39; Mar 20, 2019 $0.35; Jun 17, 2019 $0.34; Sep 24, 2019 $0.44; Dec 16, 2019 $0.45; Mar 25, 2020 $0.44; Jun 15, 2020 $0.40; Sep 23, 2020 $0.41; Dec 14, 2020 $0.40; Mar 25, 2021 $0.36; Jun 10, 2021 $0.25; Sep 24, 2021 $0.39; Dec 13, 2021 $0.40; Mar 24, 2022 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.27; Sep 26, 2022 $0.47; Dec 13, 2022 $0.40; Mar 23, 2023 $0.36; Jun 7, 2023 $0.30; Sep 26, 2023 $0.45; Dec 20, 2023 $0.48; Mar 21, 2024 $0.35; Jun 11, 2024 $0.37; Sep 25, 2024 $0.46; Dec 17, 2024 $0.43; Mar 18, 2025 $0.38; Jun 16, 2025 $0.40; Sep 16, 2025 $0.40; Dec 16, 2025 $0.48; Mar 17, 2026 $0.36; Jun 15, 2026 $0.39; Sep 15, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

GRPM vs ILCV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GRPM
  • ILCV
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: GRPM −28.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GRPM 18.0%ILCV 10.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GRPM 0.92ILCV 1.57, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GRPM −28.1%ILCV −18.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GRPM 1.00ILCV 0.82

Popular comparisons

  • GRPMCvsVONVA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsVONVA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GRPMCvsVYMA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsVYMA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GRPMCvsIMCVA

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsIMCVA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.