Skip to content

GTOP vs TRUF

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF

GTOPCNasdaq

VanEck Financials TruSector ETF

TRUFCNasdaq

Overlap

4.2%by weight

Expense ratio

TRUF −0.55pt a year

GTOP0.65%TRUF0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

GTOP 31.4×the volume

GTOP11.7KTRUF374

GTOP vs TRUF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.6%GTOP−0.4%TRUF

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GTOP −0.6%. TRUF −0.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GTOP 0.65%
TRUF 0.10%, better
Fund size
GTOP $709M
TRUF $1M
Holdings
GTOP 36
TRUF 79
Avg volume (30D)
GTOP 11.7K sh, better
TRUF 374 sh
NAV per share
GTOP $48.70
TRUF $29.47
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GTOP: Cost 43, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 67, Durability 84. TRUF: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 32, Durability 17.
Pillar letters and Scores for GTOP, TRUF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGTOPTRUF
Cost30% weightC43A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40A92Higher
Tradability15% weightC41C41
Holdings10% weightB67HigherD32
Durability5% weightA84HigherF17

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GTOP and TRUF are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

GTOP ranks 19th and TRUF 23rd of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 17CREITALPS Active REIT ETFScore 48
  2. Rank 19CGTOPGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETFScore 47
  3. Rank 19CHAUSResidential REIT ETFScore 47
  4. Rank 23CREAIIntelligent Real Estate ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 23CTRUFVanEck Financials TruSector ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 23CTRUHVanEck Healthcare TruSector ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GTOPCGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF

TRUFCVanEck Financials TruSector ETF

In short

GTOP A 1999-vintage tech stock picker wrapped in an ETF: at least 80% in technology names, free to roam from US mega caps to emerging markets, and measured against the Nasdaq Composite.

TRUF Most active funds exist to beat a benchmark. TRUF is active so it can hug one: it holds US financials at true market weight, sidestepping the diversification caps that force many sector funds to shrink their largest names.

Stated mandate

GTOP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It invests at least 80% of its net assets in technology-company equity investments and generally targets companies expected to benefit from the proliferation of technology.

TRUF The Fund is an actively managed ETF seeking long-term capital appreciation through securities of financials-related companies or instruments providing exposure to such companies.

Why people hold it

  • GTOP Genuinely active. Managers hunt companies set to benefit from the spread of technology across US, international and emerging markets instead of tracking a fixed list.
  • The 0.65% fee sits right at the median for active US equity ETFs. You pay the going rate for stock picking, not a premium for it.
  • The strategy dates to 1999, so its record runs through the dot-com bust and every tech cycle since. Few tech mandates have that much road behind them.
  • Scored against the Nasdaq Composite Total Return Index, a demanding yardstick that makes the manager's contribution easy to judge.
  • TRUF A 0.10% expense ratio, against a 0.65% median for actively managed US equity funds in its peer group.
  • The hybrid build (individual stocks plus targeted ETFs) keeps a sector's biggest contributors at uncapped weight while staying inside fund diversification rules.businesswire.comvaneck.com
  • Roughly 80 names, measured against the MarketVector Top US Financials Companies Index. The mandate is the sector itself, not a stock picker's shortlist.

Worth knowing

  • GTOP Thinly traded. Spreads can widen, so order type and timing matter more here than with the market's busiest funds.
  • One sector, concentrated book. A technology-only portfolio moves harder than a broad market fund, in both directions.
  • Broad active core rivals cost far less (DFAU 0.12%, AVLC 0.15%). The extra fee here buys concentrated tech research, not diversification.
  • TRUF VanEck says financials has not suffered the weighting distortions that hit tech and consumer discretionary, so the problem this structure solves is smaller here.vaneck.com
  • Launched in 2026 and still a small fund, so spreads can run wider than in the sector's household-name ETFs. Limit orders are the usual tool for that.
  • Owning other ETFs brings acquired fund fees, one of the items VanEck's expense arrangement does not cover, so total cost sits above the headline fee.vaneck.com

Full GTOP profile⁠

Full TRUF profile⁠

GTOP vs TRUF Holdings

How GTOP and TRUF differ

Overlap by weight

4.2%

Shared holdings make up 6.1% of TRUF and 5.2% of GTOP.

Level by level

  • Holdings2 in both4.2%
  • Countryby domicile94.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GTOP and TRUF.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GTOP and TRUF, widest gap first
CountryMore in GTOPMore in TRUF
United StatesTRUF +4.1 points
TaiwanGTOP +3.5 points
CanadaGTOP +2.3 points
SwitzerlandTRUF +1.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GTOP53.8%
  • TRUF82.1%

Securities held

  • GTOP35
  • TRUF77

Asset class

GTOP
Equity
TRUF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GTOP33
  • In both2
  • Only in TRUF75

Only in GTOP

33 securities, 92.2% of GTOP by weight

  • NVIDIA Corporation12.98%
  • Alphabet Inc.8.57%
  • Apple Inc.4.65%

Only in TRUF

75 securities, 93.9% of TRUF by weight

  • Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund59.88%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc5.02%
  • Jpmorgan Chase & Co4.57%

Weight gaps

All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GTOP and TRUF, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GTOPMore in TRUF
Visa Inc.VTRUF +1.85 points
Mastercard IncorporatedMAGTOP +0.97 points

All 36 GTOP holdings⁠All 78 TRUF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GTOP vs TRUF Cost

Overpaying GTOP vs TRUF

$10,611

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GTOP 0.65%

    $12,717

  • TRUF 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GTOP 0.65%
  • TRUF 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530GTOP $12,717TRUF $2,106

Year by year

YearGTOPTRUFOverpaying
10$1,163$183$980
20$4,440$717$3,723
30$12,717$2,106$10,611

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%GTOP
  • 0.10%TRUF, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUF cheapest of 35 funds

GTOP 19th cheapest of 35 funds

GTOP vs TRUF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GTOP None
TRUF No data
Last payment
GTOP No data
TRUF $0.10
Ex-dividend
GTOP No data
TRUF Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
GTOP No data
TRUF Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
GTOP No data
TRUF Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

GTOPAll GTOP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TRUFQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll TRUF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Jul 1, 2026 $0.11; Oct 1, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

GTOP vs TRUF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GTOP 1.50TRUF −1.04

Popular comparisons

  • GTOPCvsAVREA

    Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUFCvsAVREA

    VanEck Financials TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GTOPCvsPSRA

    Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUFCvsPSRA

    VanEck Financials TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GTOPCvsTMEDB

    Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUFCvsTMEDB

    VanEck Financials TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.