Skip to content
etf.net

HAUG vs MMAX

Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

HAUGCCboe

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

MMAXACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

HAUG −0.23pt a year

HAUG0.30%MMAX0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

HAUG 3.1×the volume

HAUG13KMMAX4.16K

HAUG vs MMAX Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−0.5%HAUG+1.1%MMAX

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. HAUG −0.5%. MMAX +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1.5%−1%0%0.5%1.5%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
HAUG 0.30%, better
MMAX 0.53%
Fund size
HAUG $3M
MMAX $74M
1Y total return
HAUG No data
MMAX +6.6%
Holdings
HAUG 4
MMAX 4
Avg volume (30D)
HAUG 13K sh, better
MMAX 4.16K sh
NAV per share
HAUG $24.92
MMAX $27.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HAUG: Cost 91, Risk 28, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 5. MMAX: Cost 83, Risk 82, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 50, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for HAUG, MMAX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHAUGMMAX
Cost30% weightA91HigherA83
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD28A82Higher
Tradability15% weightB59B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC50
Durability5% weightF5B62Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HAUG and MMAX are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Full Protection⁠

Category · 27 funds
See all 27 ›

MMAX ranks 2nd and HAUG 22nd of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPSLCalamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AMMAXiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AMAXJiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 21CZJUNInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr JuneScore 41
  5. Rank 22CHAUGCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 22CHJLYCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

HAUG vs MMAX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HAUG vs MMAX Cost

Overpaying MMAX vs HAUG

$4,387

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HAUG 0.30%

    $6,149

  • MMAX 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HAUG 0.30%
  • MMAX 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MMAX $10,536HAUG $6,149

Year by year

YearHAUGMMAXOverpaying
10$545$953$408
20$2,113$3,658$1,545
30$6,149$10,536$4,387

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%HAUG, cheaper
  • 0.53%MMAX
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
  • Median 0.69%

HAUG 2nd cheapest of 27 funds

MMAX 6th cheapest of 27 funds

HAUG vs MMAX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
HAUG None
MMAX No data
Last payment
HAUG No data
MMAX $0.35
Ex-dividend
HAUG No data
MMAX Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
HAUG No data
MMAX Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
HAUG No data
MMAX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HAUGAll HAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MMAXIrregular · 1 paymentAll MMAX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

HAUG vs MMAX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HAUG No dataMMAX 1.0%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HAUG No dataMMAX 3.21since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HAUG No dataMMAX −1.9%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HAUG 0.00MMAX 0.08

HAUG and MMAX in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • HAUGCvsCPSLA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSLA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HAUGCvsMAXJA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsMAXJA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HAUGCvsCPSNB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSNB

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.