TACU ranks 9th and HCMT 112th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
HCMT vs TACU
TACU −1.18pt a year
1.18%0.00%
HCMT 9.3×the volume
38.7K4.15K
HCMT vs TACU Performance
+1.6%+11.2%
- HCMT 1.18%
- TACU 0.00%, better
- HCMT $598M
- TACU $17M
- HCMT −2.2%
- TACU
- HCMT 0.50%
- TACU
- HCMT 509
- TACU 411
- HCMT 38.7K sh, better
- TACU 4.15K sh
- HCMT $41.23
- TACU $27.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HCMT | TACU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A99Higher |
| Mission | F5 | A81Higher |
| Risk | F12 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | A83 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | C43 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. HCMT and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HCMTF
TACUA
In short
HCMT A market-timing model in ETF form. HCMT follows the HCM-BuyLine signal: leveraged exposure to a broad basket of US stocks when the trend is on, cash when it flips off. An all-in-or-all-out design few active US equity funds attempt.
TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
HCMT The Fund seeks capital appreciation and enhanced returns across market cycles broadly correlated with U.S. equities. Its model shifts assets between U.S. equity securities and cash, using derivatives for leveraged exposure when allocated to equities.
TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HCMT vs TACU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HCMT vs TACU Cost
Overpaying HCMT vs TACU
$21,543
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HCMT 1.18%
$21,543
TACU 0.00%
$0
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HCMT | TACU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $0 | $2,065 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $0 | $7,697 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $0 | $21,543 |
- 1.18%HCMT
- 0.00%TACU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
TACU cheapest of 121 funds
HCMT 109th cheapest of 121 funds
HCMT vs TACU Dividends
- HCMT 0.50%
- TACU
- HCMT $0.20
- TACU None
- HCMT $0.0037
- TACU
- HCMT Sep 22, 2026
- TACU
- HCMT Sep 29, 2026
- TACU
- HCMT Quarterly
- TACU
Distribution history
HCMT vs TACU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HCMT 24.8%TACU
- Return per unit of risk
- HCMT 0.70TACU
- Worst fall
- HCMT −36.3%TACU
- Market sensitivity
- HCMT 1.56TACU 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.