IVVW ranks 3rd and HEQT 23rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
HEQT vs IVVW
IVVW −0.23pt a year
0.48%0.25%
HEQT 1.6×the volume
65.1K41.5K
HEQT vs IVVW Performance
+8.9%+13.4%
- HEQT 0.48%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- HEQT $307M
- IVVW $348M
- HEQT +8.9%
- IVVW +13.4%, better
- HEQT 1.17%
- IVVW 18.55%, better
- HEQT 5
- IVVW 506
- HEQT 65.1K sh, better
- IVVW 41.5K sh
- HEQT $34.16
- IVVW $44.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HEQT | IVVW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | D37 | A75Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A72Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. HEQT and IVVW are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HEQTB
IVVWA
In short
HEQT Most S&P 500 options funds sell calls to pump out income. HEQT flips the priority: a put/spread collar aimed at softening drawdowns and volatility, with long-term appreciation as the stated goal. Distributions land quarterly.
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
Stated mandate
HEQT The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. large-cap equity exposure, while using a put/spread collar option overlay intended to reduce downside risk and volatility.
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HEQT vs IVVW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HEQT vs IVVW Cost
Overpaying HEQT vs IVVW
$4,446
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HEQT 0.48%
$9,605
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HEQT | IVVW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $865 | $455 | $410 |
| 20 | $3,328 | $1,769 | $1,559 |
| 30 | $9,605 | $5,159 | $4,446 |
- 0.48%HEQT
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
HEQT 16th cheapest of 51 funds
HEQT vs IVVW Dividends
- HEQT 1.17%
- IVVW 18.55%, better
- HEQT $0.40
- IVVW $8.25
- HEQT $0.10
- IVVW $0.88
- HEQT Sep 25, 2026
- IVVW Oct 2, 2026
- HEQT Sep 30, 2026
- IVVW Oct 7, 2026
- HEQT Quarterly
- IVVW Monthly
Distribution history
HEQT vs IVVW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HEQT 6.9%IVVW 7.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- HEQT 1.46IVVW 1.10
- Worst fall
- HEQT −11.9%IVVW −16.8%
- Market sensitivity
- HEQT 0.56IVVW 0.54
HEQT and IVVW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.48% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

