Skip to content
etf.net

HJLY vs MMAX

Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

HJLYCCboe

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

MMAXACboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

HJLY −0.23pt a year

HJLY0.30%MMAX0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

MMAX 3.7×the volume

HJLY1.11KMMAX4.12K

HJLY vs MMAX Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.7%HJLY+1.4%MMAX

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. HJLY +0.7%. MMAX +1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.25%0.5%1%1.25%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HJLY 0.30%, better
MMAX 0.53%
Fund size
HJLY $1M
MMAX $74M
1Y total return
HJLY No data
MMAX +6.5%
Holdings
HJLY 4
MMAX 4
Avg volume (30D)
HJLY 1.11K sh
MMAX 4.12K sh, better
NAV per share
HJLY $25.41
MMAX $27.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HJLY: Cost 91, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 20, Holdings not scored, Durability 4. MMAX: Cost 83, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 50, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for HJLY, MMAX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHJLYMMAX
Cost30% weightA91HigherA83
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51A81Higher
Tradability15% weightF20B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC50
Durability5% weightF4B62Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HJLY and MMAX are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Full Protection⁠

Category · 27 funds
See all 27 ›

MMAX ranks 2nd and HJLY 22nd of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPSLCalamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AMMAXiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AMAXJiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 22CHAUGCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 22CHJLYCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 22CHMAYCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40

HJLY vs MMAX Holdings

How HJLY and MMAX differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of HJLY and 0.0% of MMAX.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in HJLY and MMAX, widest gap first
SectorMore in HJLYMore in MMAX
CommunicationMMAX +1.0 points
TechnologyMMAX +0.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryHJLY +0.4 points
FinancialsHJLY +0.4 points
Health CareHJLY +0.4 points
EnergyHJLY +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesHJLY +0.3 points
UtilitiesHJLY +0.1 points
IndustrialsMMAX +0.1 points
MaterialsMMAX +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HJLY and MMAX, widest gap first
CountryMore in HJLYMore in MMAX
United StatesMMAX +0.1 points
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoHJLY +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HJLY102.6%
  • MMAX112.3%

Securities held

  • HJLY3
  • MMAX2

Asset class

HJLY
Equity
MMAX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in HJLY3
  • In both0
  • Only in MMAX2

Only in HJLY

3 securities, 100% of HJLY by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 149.14 C78.22%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.25%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 745.72 P3.96%

Only in MMAX

2 securities, 100% of MMAX by weight

  • Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust109.74%
  • APR27 Ivv Us P @ 653.211.26%

Weight gaps

HJLY and MMAX share no securities.

All HJLY holdings⁠All MMAX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HJLY vs MMAX Cost

Overpaying MMAX vs HJLY

$4,387

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HJLY 0.30%

    $6,149

  • MMAX 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HJLY 0.30%
  • MMAX 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MMAX $10,536HJLY $6,149

Year by year

YearHJLYMMAXOverpaying
10$545$953$408
20$2,113$3,658$1,545
30$6,149$10,536$4,387

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%HJLY, cheaper
  • 0.53%MMAX
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
  • Median 0.69%

HJLY 2nd cheapest of 27 funds

MMAX 6th cheapest of 27 funds

HJLY vs MMAX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
HJLY None
MMAX No data
Last payment
HJLY No data
MMAX $0.35
Ex-dividend
HJLY No data
MMAX Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
HJLY No data
MMAX Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
HJLY No data
MMAX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HJLYAll HJLY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MMAXIrregular · 1 paymentAll MMAX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

HJLY vs MMAX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HJLY No dataMMAX 1.0%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HJLY No dataMMAX 3.21since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HJLY No dataMMAX −1.9%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HJLY 0.00MMAX 0.08

HJLY and MMAX in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • HJLYCvsCPSLA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSLA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HJLYCvsMAXJA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsMAXJA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HJLYCvsCPSNB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSNB

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.