Skip to content
etf.net

HMAY vs MMAX

Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

HMAYCCboe

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

MMAXACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

HMAY −0.23pt a year

HMAY0.30%MMAX0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

MMAX 1.8×the volume

HMAY2.24KMMAX4.12K

HMAY vs MMAX Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.6%HMAY+1.4%MMAX

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. HMAY +0.6%. MMAX +1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.25%0.75%1%1.25%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HMAY 0.30%, better
MMAX 0.53%
Fund size
HMAY $2M
MMAX $74M
1Y total return
HMAY No data
MMAX +6.5%
Holdings
HMAY 4
MMAX 4
Avg volume (30D)
HMAY 2.24K sh
MMAX 4.12K sh, better
NAV per share
HMAY $25.49
MMAX $27.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HMAY: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings not scored, Durability 5. MMAX: Cost 83, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 50, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for HMAY, MMAX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHMAYMMAX
Cost30% weightA91HigherA83
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49A81Higher
Tradability15% weightD26B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC50
Durability5% weightF5B62Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HMAY and MMAX are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Full Protection⁠

Category · 27 funds
See all 27 ›

MMAX ranks 2nd and HMAY 22nd of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPSLCalamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AMMAXiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AMAXJiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 22CHJLYCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 22CHMAYCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 22CMAYCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40

HMAY vs MMAX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HMAY vs MMAX Cost

Overpaying MMAX vs HMAY

$4,387

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HMAY 0.30%

    $6,149

  • MMAX 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HMAY 0.30%
  • MMAX 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MMAX $10,536HMAY $6,149

Year by year

YearHMAYMMAXOverpaying
10$545$953$408
20$2,113$3,658$1,545
30$6,149$10,536$4,387

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%HMAY, cheaper
  • 0.53%MMAX
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
  • Median 0.69%

HMAY 2nd cheapest of 27 funds

MMAX 6th cheapest of 27 funds

HMAY vs MMAX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
HMAY None
MMAX No data
Last payment
HMAY No data
MMAX $0.35
Ex-dividend
HMAY No data
MMAX Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
HMAY No data
MMAX Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
HMAY No data
MMAX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HMAYAll HMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MMAXIrregular · 1 paymentAll MMAX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

HMAY vs MMAX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HMAY No dataMMAX 1.0%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HMAY No dataMMAX 3.21since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HMAY No dataMMAX −1.9%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HMAY 0.18MMAX 0.08

HMAY and MMAX in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • HMAYCvsCPSLA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSLA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HMAYCvsMAXJA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsMAXJA

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HMAYCvsCPSNB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MMAXAvsCPSNB

    iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF · Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.