IACL vs MPIM: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF

IACL—Cboe

m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF

MPIM—NYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

IACL −0.15pt a year

IACL0.55%MPIM0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

MPIM 12.2×the volume

IACL3.85KMPIM47K

IACL vs MPIM Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.7%IACL−5.6%MPIM

Expense ratio: IACL 0.55%, better; MPIM 0.70%
Fund size: IACL $4M; MPIM $38M
Holdings: IACL 3; MPIM 3
Avg volume (30D): IACL 3.85K sh; MPIM 47K sh, better
NAV per share: IACL $24.95; MPIM $22.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

—IACLNot yet graded
—MPIMNot yet graded

Rank among Autocallable Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Autocallable Income⁠

Category · 10 funds

See all 10 ›

IACLNot yet graded
MPIMNot yet graded

IACL vs MPIM Holdings

How IACL and MPIM differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IACL and 0.0% of MPIM.

Level by level

Asset classEquity, Alternatives0.0%
Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

No Sector split for IACL and MPIM.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IACL and MPIM, widest gap first
Country	More in IACLMore in MPIM	IACL	MPIM
United States	MPIM +0.5 points	99.5%	100.0%
Switzerland	IACL +0.3 points	0.3%	0.0%
China	IACL +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Mexico	IACL +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Ireland	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%
United Kingdom	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

IACL100.0%
MPIM106.2%

Securities held

IACL2
MPIM2

Asset class

IACL: Equity
MPIM: Alternatives

Holdings

Only in IACL2
In both0
Only in MPIM2

Only in IACL

2 securities, 17.9% of IACL by weight

GraniteShares Short Term Box ETF17.85%
Bloomberg US 100 Autocallable 65-40 Series Total Return Index0.04%

Only in MPIM

2 securities, 100% of MPIM by weight

B 11/12/26105.69%
Frst Am-Gv Ob-X0.53%

Weight gaps

IACL and MPIM share no securities.

All 2 IACL holdings⁠All MPIM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IACL vs MPIM Cost

Overpaying MPIM vs IACL

$2,702

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

IACL 0.55%
$10,904
MPIM 0.70%
$13,606

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

IACL 0.55%
MPIM 0.70%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	IACL	MPIM	Overpaying
10	$988	$1,250	$262
20	$3,790	$4,760	$970
30	$10,904	$13,606	$2,702

Expense ratio

0.55%IACL, cheaper
0.70%MPIM

IACL0.55%MPIM0.70%

0.55%0.97%

Middle half of Autocallable Income funds
Median 0.70%

IACL cheapest of 10 funds

MPIM 4th cheapest of 10 funds

IACL vs MPIM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Last payment: IACL $0.18; MPIM $0.31
Ex-dividend: IACL Oct 7, 2026; MPIM Oct 20, 2026
Paid on: IACL Oct 9, 2026; MPIM Oct 26, 2026
Frequency: IACL Monthly; MPIM Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

IACLMonthly · 2 paymentsAll IACL payments⁠

MPIMMonthly · 2 paymentsAll MPIM payments⁠

IACL vs MPIM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: IACL 0.00MPIM 0.00; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

IACL—vsTSIBF
GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF · Direxion TSLA Defined Income Boost ETF
Expense ratio
0.55% · 0.97%
Category
MPIM—vsTSIBF
m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Direxion TSLA Defined Income Boost ETF
Expense ratio
0.70% · 0.97%
Category