IACL vs TSIB: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF

IACL—Cboe

Direxion TSLA Defined Income Boost ETF

TSIBFCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

IACL −0.42pt a year

IACL0.55%TSIB0.97%

Avg volume · 30D

IACL 9.9×the volume

IACL3.85KTSIB389

IACL vs TSIB Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.7%IACL+14.5%TSIB

Expense ratio: IACL 0.55%, better; TSIB 0.97%
Fund size: IACL $4M; TSIB $3M
Holdings: IACL 3; TSIB 6
Avg volume (30D): IACL 3.85K sh, better; TSIB 389 sh
NAV per share: IACL $24.95; TSIB $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

—IACLNot yet graded

Pillar letters and Scores for IACL, TSIB, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	IACL	TSIB
Cost30% weight	Not scored	F5
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	Not scored	C49
Tradability15% weight	Not scored	F6
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Durability5% weight	Not scored	C48

Rank among Autocallable Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Autocallable Income⁠

Category · 10 funds

See all 10 ›

TSIB ranks 1st of 10 funds in the Autocallable Income Category.

Rank 1FTSIBDirexion TSLA Defined Income Boost ETFScore 9
ACBHNot yet graded
ACQQNot yet graded
ACRTNot yet graded
ACSPNot yet graded
DACLNot yet graded
IACLNot yet graded
MPDYNot yet graded
MPIANot yet graded
MPIMNot yet graded

IACL vs TSIB Holdings

How IACL and TSIB differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IACL and 0.0% of TSIB.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Asset classEquity100%
Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

No Sector split for IACL.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IACL and TSIB, widest gap first
Country	More in IACLMore in TSIB	IACL	TSIB
United States	TSIB +0.5 points	99.5%	100.0%
Switzerland	IACL +0.3 points	0.3%	0.0%
China	IACL +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Mexico	IACL +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Ireland	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%
United Kingdom	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

IACL100.0%
TSIB100.0%

Securities held

IACL2
TSIB1

Asset class

IACL: Equity
TSIB: Equity

Holdings

Only in IACL2
In both0
Only in TSIB1

Only in IACL

2 securities, 17.9% of IACL by weight

GraniteShares Short Term Box ETF17.85%
Bloomberg US 100 Autocallable 65-40 Series Total Return Index0.04%

Only in TSIB

1 security, 5.5% of TSIB by weight

Tesla Inc5.52%

Weight gaps

IACL and TSIB share no securities.

All 2 IACL holdings⁠All TSIB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IACL vs TSIB Cost

Overpaying TSIB vs IACL

$7,294

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

IACL 0.55%
$10,904
TSIB 0.97%
$18,198

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

IACL 0.55%
TSIB 0.97%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	IACL	TSIB	Overpaying
10	$988	$1,712	$724
20	$3,790	$6,443	$2,653
30	$10,904	$18,198	$7,294

Expense ratio

0.55%IACL, cheaper
0.97%TSIB

IACL0.55%TSIB0.97%

0.55%0.97%

Middle half of Autocallable Income funds
Median 0.70%

IACL cheapest of 10 funds

TSIB 10th cheapest of 10 funds

IACL vs TSIB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Last payment: IACL $0.18; TSIB $0.26
Ex-dividend: IACL Oct 7, 2026; TSIB Oct 30, 2026
Paid on: IACL Oct 9, 2026; TSIB Pays Nov 2, 2026
Frequency: IACL Monthly; TSIB Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

IACLMonthly · 2 paymentsAll IACL payments⁠

TSIBIrregular · 6 paymentsAll TSIB payments⁠

IACL vs TSIB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: IACL 0.00TSIB 0.00; Market = 1