IBDT ranks 3rd and MYCG 31st of 42 funds in the Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate Category.
IBDT vs MYCG
IBDT −0.05pt a year
0.10%0.15%
IBDT 65.8×the volume
734K11.2K
IBDT vs MYCG Performance
+2.7%+3.8%
- IBDT 0.10%, better
- MYCG 0.15%
- IBDT $4.16B
- MYCG $50M
- IBDT +2.7%
- MYCG +3.8%, better
- IBDT 4.51%, better
- MYCG 4.33%
- IBDT 743
- MYCG 171
- IBDT 734K sh, better
- MYCG 11.2K sh
- IBDT $25.00
- MYCG $24.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBDT | MYCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | A71 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A86Higher | C48 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. IBDT and MYCG are both graded against the same 42 Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBDTA
MYCGC
In short
IBDT Acts more like a bond than a bond fund: roughly 700 investment-grade corporate bonds that all mature in 2028, wrapped in one ticker with a defined end date. Built for ladder rungs, monthly distributions and a known finish line.
MYCG Target-maturity bond funds are mostly index ladders on autopilot. MYCG is the active take: State Street's managers hand-pick the 2027 corporate bonds, aiming for income and capital preservation while the clock runs down.
Stated mandate
IBDT The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade corporate bonds maturing in 2028 and is designed to support income generation, bond-ladder construction, and interest-rate-risk management through a defined maturity.
MYCG The fund uses an actively managed target-maturity approach focused primarily on corporate bonds maturing in 2027. It seeks current income and capital preservation through top-down sector and issuer positioning combined with fundamental security selection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBDT vs MYCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBDT vs MYCG Cost
Overpaying MYCG vs IBDT
$1,031
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBDT 0.10%
$2,106
MYCG 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBDT | MYCG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $274 | $91 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,071 | $354 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,137 | $1,031 |
- 0.10%IBDT, cheaper
- 0.15%MYCG
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.10%
IBDT 11th cheapest of 42 funds
MYCG 33rd cheapest of 42 funds
IBDT vs MYCG Dividends
- IBDT 4.51%, better
- MYCG 4.33%
- IBDT $1.13
- MYCG $1.08
- IBDT $0.09
- MYCG $0.10
- IBDT Nov 2, 2026
- MYCG Nov 2, 2026
- IBDT Nov 5, 2026
- MYCG Nov 5, 2026
- IBDT Monthly
- MYCG Monthly
Distribution history
IBDT vs MYCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBDT 3.4%MYCG 1.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBDT 0.57MYCG 0.04
- Worst fall
- IBDT −16.7%MYCG −0.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IBDT 0.60MYCG 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.