IBDT ranks 3rd and MYCL 42nd of 42 funds in the Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate Category.
IBDT vs MYCL
IBDT −0.05pt a year
0.10%0.15%
IBDT 229.7×the volume
734K3.2K
IBDT vs MYCL Performance
+2.7%+0.3%
- IBDT 0.10%, better
- MYCL 0.15%
- IBDT $4.16B
- MYCL $12M
- IBDT +2.7%, better
- MYCL +0.3%
- IBDT 4.51%
- MYCL 4.78%, better
- IBDT 743
- MYCL 112
- IBDT 734K sh, better
- MYCL 3.2K sh
- IBDT $25.00
- MYCL $23.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBDT | MYCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A86Higher | D26 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. IBDT and MYCL are both graded against the same 42 Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBDTA
MYCLF
In short
IBDT Acts more like a bond than a bond fund: roughly 700 investment-grade corporate bonds that all mature in 2028, wrapped in one ticker with a defined end date. Built for ladder rungs, monthly distributions and a known finish line.
MYCL A corporate bond fund with an expiration date: it holds bonds maturing in 2032, then winds up around December 15, 2032 and pays out what is left. The twist is that State Street runs this rung actively rather than by index rulebook.
Stated mandate
IBDT The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade corporate bonds maturing in 2028 and is designed to support income generation, bond-ladder construction, and interest-rate-risk management through a defined maturity.
MYCL The fund uses an actively managed target-maturity strategy focused primarily on corporate bonds maturing in 2032, with liquidation planned around December 15, 2032 after distributing remaining principal.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBDT vs MYCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBDT vs MYCL Cost
Overpaying MYCL vs IBDT
$1,031
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBDT 0.10%
$2,106
MYCL 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBDT | MYCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $274 | $91 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,071 | $354 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,137 | $1,031 |
- 0.10%IBDT, cheaper
- 0.15%MYCL
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.10%
IBDT 11th cheapest of 42 funds
MYCL 33rd cheapest of 42 funds
IBDT vs MYCL Dividends
- IBDT 4.51%
- MYCL 4.78%, better
- IBDT $1.13
- MYCL $1.14
- IBDT $0.09
- MYCL $0.10
- IBDT Nov 2, 2026
- MYCL Nov 2, 2026
- IBDT Nov 5, 2026
- MYCL Nov 5, 2026
- IBDT Monthly
- MYCL Monthly
Distribution history
IBDT vs MYCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBDT 3.4%MYCL 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBDT 0.57MYCL −0.38
- Worst fall
- IBDT −16.7%MYCL −4.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IBDT 0.60MYCL 0.13
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.