IBTJ ranks 4th and LFAO 26th of 30 funds in the Defined-Maturity Treasury Category.
IBTJ vs LFAO
IBTJ −0.18pt a year
0.07%0.25%
IBTJ 3130.5×the volume
429K137
IBTJ vs LFAO Performance
+1.1%−2.4%
- IBTJ 0.07%, better
- LFAO 0.25%
- IBTJ $1.6B
- LFAO $3M
- IBTJ +1.1%, better
- LFAO −2.4%
- IBTJ 3.79%
- LFAO 6.38%, better
- IBTJ 39
- LFAO 24
- IBTJ 429K sh, better
- LFAO 137 sh
- IBTJ $21.39
- LFAO $156.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBTJ | LFAO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F20 |
| Risk | C50Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B67 |
| Durability | A88Higher | D33 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Treasury funds
Same Category. IBTJ and LFAO are both graded against the same 30 Defined-Maturity Treasury funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBTJA
LFAOD
In short
IBTJ One rung of a Treasury ladder in a single ticker. IBTJ holds only US Treasuries maturing in 2029, giving a defined end date instead of a bond fund that rolls its maturities forever.
Stated mandate
IBTJ The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury bonds maturing in 2029, offering defined-maturity exposure for income, stability, bond-ladder construction, and interest-rate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBTJ vs LFAO Holdings
How IBTJ and LFAO differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
IBTJ and LFAO share no Sector name, so they cannot be compared by Sector.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBTJMore in LFAO | Gap | IBTJ | LFAO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- IBTJ35.7%
- LFAO86.2%
- IBTJ38
- LFAO23
Asset class
- IBTJ
- Bonds
- LFAO
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. IBTJ holds 38 securities, LFAO 23.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBTJ vs LFAO Cost
Overpaying LFAO vs IBTJ
$3,679
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBTJ 0.07%
$1,480
LFAO 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBTJ | LFAO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $455 | $327 |
| 20 | $503 | $1,769 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $5,159 | $3,679 |
- 0.07%IBTJ, cheaper
- 0.25%LFAO
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Treasury funds
- Median 0.07%
IBTJ cheapest of 30 funds
LFAO 24th cheapest of 30 funds
IBTJ vs LFAO Dividends
- IBTJ 3.79%
- LFAO 6.38%, better
- IBTJ $0.81
- LFAO $10.00
- IBTJ $0.07
- LFAO $0.83
- IBTJ Nov 2, 2026
- LFAO Nov 3, 2026
- IBTJ Nov 5, 2026
- LFAO Nov 4, 2026
- IBTJ Monthly
- LFAO Monthly
Distribution history
IBTJ vs LFAO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBTJ 4.0%LFAO 8.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBTJ 0.13LFAO −0.88
- Worst fall
- IBTJ −15.9%LFAO −12.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IBTJ 0.72LFAO 0.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.