Skip to content

IBUF vs RSJN

Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

IBUFBNYSE Arca

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

RSJNBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

IBUF0.85%RSJN0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

RSJN 1.6×the volume

IBUF18KRSJN28.4K

IBUF vs RSJN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.8%IBUF+13.5%RSJN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IBUF +9.8%. RSJN +13.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IBUF 0.85%
RSJN 0.85%
Fund size
IBUF $121M
RSJN $86M
1Y total return
IBUF +9.8%
RSJN +13.5%, better
Holdings
IBUF 3
RSJN 3
Avg volume (30D)
IBUF 18K sh
RSJN 28.4K sh, better
NAV per share
IBUF $31.34
RSJN $38.13
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBUF: Cost 39, Risk 75, Mission 96, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 80. RSJN: Cost 39, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 57, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBUF, RSJN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBUFRSJN
Cost30% weightD39D39
Mission25% weightA96Not scored
Risk15% weightA75A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA74HigherB65
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB57
Durability5% weightA80A84Higher

Rank among Other Buffered funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBUF and RSJN are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Buffered⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

IBUF ranks 3rd and RSJN 4th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.

  1. Rank 1BKBFRInnovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BTBJLInnovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - JulyScore 60
  3. Rank 3BIBUFInnovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BRSJNFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - JuneScore 57
  5. Rank 5CRSMRFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - MarchScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBUFBInnovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

RSJNBFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

In short

IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.

RSJN Most buffer ETFs are bolted onto the cap-weighted S&P 500, where a few megacaps call the shots. RSJN buffers the equal-weight version instead: the same 500-odd names, spread evenly, with the first 10% of losses absorbed over each June-to-June period.

Stated mandate

IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.

RSJN Seeks returns matching the Underlying ETF’s price return up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of its losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 Target Outcome Period.

Why people hold it

  • IBUF Buffer funds crowd around US large caps. This one references the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, so the 10% cushion sits on developed markets outside the US.
  • The outcome period runs a quarter, not a year, so the buffer and the cap reset four times annually rather than once.
  • At 0.85% a year, it comes in under the median fee among the buffer funds we track.
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in its buffer-fund peer group on our review.
  • RSJN The reference asset is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, so roughly 500 companies carry similar weight and no single megacap steers the outcome. A rare flavor in a cohort built mostly on cap-weighted indexes.ftportfolios.com
  • The rules are written down, not left to a manager's judgment: absorb the first 10% of the underlying ETF's price decline over the stated outcome period, in exchange for an upside cap set at each period's start.ftportfolios.com
  • Expense ratio is 0.85%, right in line with what defined-outcome funds in its peer group charge for the same options plumbing.
  • June is one of three siblings on the same equal-weight reference (March and September round it out), so start dates can be laddered instead of hitched to one calendar.ftportfolios.com

Worth knowing

  • IBUF The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Gains above each quarter's cap are given up, and that cap is reset at the start of every outcome period.
  • The 10% buffer is designed for investors who hold a full outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and your actual cushion and cap differ from the stated terms.
  • Launched in July 2024 and lightly traded, so the track record is short and spreads can run wider than on large index funds.
  • RSJN The buffer is paid for with a ceiling: gains in the underlying ETF above the period's cap don't come through. Terms also reset each June, so entering mid-period changes your effective cap and remaining buffer.ftportfolios.com
  • The target is price return on the underlying ETF, held via FLEX options, so dividends from those 500 companies are not passed through. Income is not part of the design.ftportfolios.com
  • Trading is light next to the biggest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with a mega-cap-index product.

Full IBUF profile⁠

Full RSJN profile⁠

IBUF vs RSJN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBUF vs RSJN Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBUF 0.85%

    $16,199

  • RSJN 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBUF 0.85%
  • RSJN 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IBUF $16,199RSJN $16,199

Year by year

YearIBUFRSJN
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IBUF
  • 0.85%RSJN
  • Middle half of Other Buffered funds
  • Median 0.85%

IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

RSJN 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

IBUF vs RSJN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
IBUF None
RSJN None

Distribution history

IBUFAll IBUF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RSJNAll RSJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IBUF vs RSJN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBUF 4.0%since Aug 2024RSJN 7.4%since Jul 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBUF 1.40since Aug 2024RSJN 0.84since Jul 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBUF −5.9%since Jul 2024RSJN −12.4%since Jun 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBUF 0.14RSJN 0.49

Popular comparisons

  • IBUFBvsKBFRB

    Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsKBFRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBUFBvsTBJLB

    Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsTBJLB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBUFBvsRSMRC

    Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsRSMRC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.