IBUF ranks 3rd and RSJN 4th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
IBUF vs RSJN
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
RSJN 1.6×the volume
18K28.4K
IBUF vs RSJN Performance
+9.8%+13.5%
- IBUF 0.85%
- RSJN 0.85%
- IBUF $121M
- RSJN $86M
- IBUF +9.8%
- RSJN +13.5%, better
- IBUF 3
- RSJN 3
- IBUF 18K sh
- RSJN 28.4K sh, better
- IBUF $31.34
- RSJN $38.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBUF | RSJN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | D39 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | A75 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A80 | A84Higher |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. IBUF and RSJN are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBUFB
RSJNB
In short
IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.
RSJN Most buffer ETFs are bolted onto the cap-weighted S&P 500, where a few megacaps call the shots. RSJN buffers the equal-weight version instead: the same 500-odd names, spread evenly, with the first 10% of losses absorbed over each June-to-June period.
Stated mandate
IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.
RSJN Seeks returns matching the Underlying ETF’s price return up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of its losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 Target Outcome Period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBUF vs RSJN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBUF vs RSJN Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBUF 0.85%
$16,199
RSJN 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBUF | RSJN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%IBUF
- 0.85%RSJN
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RSJN 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
IBUF vs RSJN Dividends
- IBUF None
- RSJN None
Distribution history
IBUF vs RSJN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBUF 4.0%RSJN 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBUF 1.40RSJN 0.84
- Worst fall
- IBUF −5.9%RSJN −12.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IBUF 0.14RSJN 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.