IBUF ranks 3rd and RSSE 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
IBUF vs RSSE
0.0%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
IBUF 1.8×the volume
18K9.94K
IBUF vs RSSE Performance
+9.8%+13.9%
- IBUF 0.85%
- RSSE 0.85%
- IBUF $121M
- RSSE $35M
- IBUF +9.8%
- RSSE +13.9%, better
- IBUF 3
- RSSE 3
- IBUF 18K sh, better
- RSSE 9.94K sh
- IBUF $31.34
- RSSE $23.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBUF | RSSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | D39 |
| Mission | A96Higher | A83 |
| Risk | A75 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | B67 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. IBUF and RSSE are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBUFB
RSSEC
In short
IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.
RSSE Most buffer ETFs bolt their downside cushion onto the megacap-heavy S&P 500. This one uses the equal-weight version instead, buffering the first 10% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every September.
Stated mandate
IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.
RSSE The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBUF vs RSSE Holdings
How IBUF and RSSE differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IBUF and 0.0% of RSSE.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for RSSE.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for RSSE.
Concentration
- IBUF102.0%
- RSSE103.4%
- IBUF3
- RSSE2
Asset class
- IBUF
- Alternatives
- RSSE
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in IBUF3
- In both0
- Only in RSSE2
Only in IBUF
3 securities, 100% of IBUF by weight
- Efa 12/31/2026 0.26 C98.12%
- Efa 12/31/2026 103.89 P3.10%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.79%
Only in RSSE
2 securities, 100% of RSSE by weight
- 2027-09-17 Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF C 2.1298.91%
- 2027-09-17 Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF P 212.293.46%
Weight gaps
IBUF and RSSE share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBUF vs RSSE Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBUF 0.85%
$16,199
RSSE 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBUF | RSSE |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%IBUF
- 0.85%RSSE
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RSSE 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
IBUF vs RSSE Dividends
- IBUF None
- RSSE None
Distribution history
IBUF vs RSSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBUF 4.0%RSSE 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBUF 1.40RSSE 0.67
- Worst fall
- IBUF −5.9%RSSE −11.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IBUF 0.14RSSE 0.44
IBUF and RSSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
