Skip to content

IBUF vs RSSE

Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

IBUFBNYSE Arca

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September

RSSECNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

IBUF0.85%RSSE0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

IBUF 1.8×the volume

IBUF18KRSSE9.94K

IBUF vs RSSE Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.8%IBUF+13.9%RSSE

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IBUF +9.8%. RSSE +13.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IBUF 0.85%
RSSE 0.85%
Fund size
IBUF $121M
RSSE $35M
1Y total return
IBUF +9.8%
RSSE +13.9%, better
Holdings
IBUF 3
RSSE 3
Avg volume (30D)
IBUF 18K sh, better
RSSE 9.94K sh
NAV per share
IBUF $31.34
RSSE $23.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBUF: Cost 39, Risk 75, Mission 96, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 80. RSSE: Cost 39, Risk 79, Mission 83, Tradability 64, Holdings 38, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBUF, RSSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBUFRSSE
Cost30% weightD39D39
Mission25% weightA96HigherA83
Risk15% weightA75A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA74HigherB64
Holdings10% weightNot scoredD38
Durability5% weightA80HigherB67

Rank among Other Buffered funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBUF and RSSE are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Buffered⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

IBUF ranks 3rd and RSSE 5th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.

  1. Rank 1BKBFRInnovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BTBJLInnovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - JulyScore 60
  3. Rank 3BIBUFInnovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BRSJNFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - JuneScore 57
  5. Rank 5CRSMRFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - MarchScore 53
  6. Rank 5CRSSEFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 53
  7. Rank 7CIBFRInnovator International Developed Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBUFBInnovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

RSSECFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September

In short

IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.

RSSE Most buffer ETFs bolt their downside cushion onto the megacap-heavy S&P 500. This one uses the equal-weight version instead, buffering the first 10% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every September.

Stated mandate

IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.

RSSE The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • IBUF Buffer funds crowd around US large caps. This one references the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, so the 10% cushion sits on developed markets outside the US.
  • The outcome period runs a quarter, not a year, so the buffer and the cap reset four times annually rather than once.
  • At 0.85% a year, it comes in under the median fee among the buffer funds we track.
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in its buffer-fund peer group on our review.
  • RSSE Buffers the first 10% of losses on the price return of the equal-weight S&P 500 ETF, so the cushion sits on a broadly spread index rather than a handful of megacaps.
  • Fee of 0.85% a year, slightly under the middle of the buffer-ETF pack, and equal-weight defined-outcome funds are a small corner of that market.
  • One rung of a ladder: sibling fund RSJN runs the same equal-weight buffer strategy from a June start at the same 0.85% fee, so entry months can be staggered.

Worth knowing

  • IBUF The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Gains above each quarter's cap are given up, and that cap is reset at the start of every outcome period.
  • The 10% buffer is designed for investors who hold a full outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and your actual cushion and cap differ from the stated terms.
  • Launched in July 2024 and lightly traded, so the track record is short and spreads can run wider than on large index funds.
  • RSSE Upside is capped. The cap is reset each September for the new outcome period, so gains beyond it in the reference index do not pass through.
  • Small asset base and light trading, so spreads can run wider than in the largest buffer funds. Buying mid-period also changes the buffer and cap actually in play.
  • Launched in 2024, so the track record is short, and the options structure is built to shape returns rather than pay income.

Full IBUF profile⁠

Full RSSE profile⁠

IBUF vs RSSE Holdings

How IBUF and RSSE differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IBUF and 0.0% of RSSE.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for RSSE.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for RSSE.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IBUF102.0%
  • RSSE103.4%

Securities held

  • IBUF3
  • RSSE2

Asset class

IBUF
Alternatives
RSSE
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in IBUF3
  • In both0
  • Only in RSSE2

Only in IBUF

3 securities, 100% of IBUF by weight

  • Efa 12/31/2026 0.26 C98.12%
  • Efa 12/31/2026 103.89 P3.10%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.79%

Only in RSSE

2 securities, 100% of RSSE by weight

  • 2027-09-17 Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF C 2.1298.91%
  • 2027-09-17 Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF P 212.293.46%

Weight gaps

IBUF and RSSE share no securities.

All IBUF holdings⁠All 4 RSSE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBUF vs RSSE Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBUF 0.85%

    $16,199

  • RSSE 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBUF 0.85%
  • RSSE 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IBUF $16,199RSSE $16,199

Year by year

YearIBUFRSSE
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IBUF
  • 0.85%RSSE
  • Middle half of Other Buffered funds
  • Median 0.85%

IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

RSSE 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

IBUF vs RSSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
IBUF None
RSSE None

Distribution history

IBUFAll IBUF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RSSEAll RSSE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IBUF vs RSSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBUF 4.0%since Aug 2024RSSE 7.1%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBUF 1.40since Aug 2024RSSE 0.67since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBUF −5.9%since Jul 2024RSSE −11.4%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBUF 0.14RSSE 0.44

IBUF and RSSE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IBUFBvsKBFRB

    Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSECvsKBFRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBUFBvsTBJLB

    Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSECvsTBJLB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September · Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBUFBvsRSJNB

    Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF · FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSECvsRSJNB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September · FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.