TBJL ranks 2nd and IBUF 3rd of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
IBUF vs TBJL
TBJL −0.06pt a year
0.85%0.79%
IBUF 1.5×the volume
18K12.2K
IBUF vs TBJL Performance
+9.8%−6.0%
- IBUF 0.85%
- TBJL 0.79%, better
- IBUF $121M
- TBJL $9M
- IBUF +9.8%, better
- TBJL −6.0%
- IBUF 3
- TBJL 3
- IBUF 18K sh, better
- TBJL 12.2K sh
- IBUF $31.34
- TBJL $19.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBUF | TBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A80Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. IBUF and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBUFB
TBJLB
In short
IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.
TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.
Stated mandate
IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.
TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBUF vs TBJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBUF vs TBJL Cost
Overpaying IBUF vs TBJL
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBUF 0.85%
$16,199
TBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBUF | TBJL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,405 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,331 | $375 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $15,174 | $1,025 |
- 0.85%IBUF
- 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
TBJL cheapest of 9 funds
IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
IBUF vs TBJL Dividends
- IBUF None
- TBJL None
Distribution history
IBUF vs TBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBUF 4.0%TBJL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBUF 1.40TBJL −0.19
- Worst fall
- IBUF −5.9%TBJL −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IBUF 0.14TBJL 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.