ICSH ranks 1st and LDUR 64th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs LDUR
ICSH −0.43pt a year
0.08%0.51%
ICSH 20.1×the volume
1.68M83.7K
ICSH +0.4pt
+2.9%+2.5%
ICSH vs LDUR Performance
+21.5%+13.1%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- LDUR 0.51%
- ICSH $8.9B
- LDUR $1.39B
- ICSH +3.7%, better
- LDUR +2.8%
- ICSH 4.12%
- LDUR 4.18%, better
- ICSH 400
- LDUR 667
- ICSH 1.68M sh, better
- LDUR 83.7K sh
- ICSH $50.35
- LDUR $94.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | LDUR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F1 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A90Higher | A72 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and LDUR are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
LDURC
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
LDUR Short bonds, run by hand. LDUR is PIMCO's actively managed low-duration portfolio: US, foreign and emerging-market debt, roughly 500 positions, income paid monthly, on the tape since 2014.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
LDUR The Fund seeks total return through income from investments and potential capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in a diversified portfolio of fixed-income instruments with varying maturities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs LDUR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs LDUR Cost
Overpaying LDUR vs ICSH
$8,476
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
LDUR 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | LDUR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $918 | $771 |
| 20 | $575 | $3,527 | $2,952 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $10,165 | $8,476 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.51%LDUR
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
LDUR 77th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs LDUR Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- LDUR 4.18%, better
- ICSH $2.07
- LDUR $3.95
- ICSH $0.18
- LDUR $0.34
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- LDUR Nov 2, 2026
- ICSH Nov 5, 2026
- LDUR Nov 4, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- LDUR Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs LDUR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ICSH
- LDUR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%, betterLDUR 1.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87, betterLDUR 0.31
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%, betterLDUR −6.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04LDUR 0.20
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.