ICSH ranks 1st and MMKT 60th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs MMKT
ICSH −0.12pt a year
0.08%0.20%
ICSH 313.0×the volume
1.64M5.25K
ICSH vs MMKT Performance
+3.6%+3.5%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- MMKT 0.20%
- ICSH $8.97B
- MMKT $68M
- ICSH +3.6%, better
- MMKT +3.5%
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- MMKT 3.63%
- ICSH 408
- MMKT 30
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- MMKT 5.25K sh
- ICSH $50.47
- MMKT $100.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | MMKT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A90Higher | D36 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and MMKT are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
MMKTC
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
MMKT Money markets went unchallenged by ETFs for three decades. MMKT was the first fund to run a government money market portfolio under Rule 2a-7 inside an ETF wrapper, with one twist: no fixed $1 share price.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
MMKT The Fund seeks current interest income while maintaining liquidity and stability of principal. It invests primarily in high-quality U.S. government money market instruments and related repurchase agreements.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs MMKT Holdings
How ICSH and MMKT differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country75.4%
Sector
No Sector split for MMKT.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ICSHMore in MMKT | ICSH | MMKT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | MMKT +24.6 points | 75.4% | 100.0% |
| Canada | ICSH +4.5 points | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | ICSH +3.3 points | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| Australia | ICSH +3.1 points | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Sweden | ICSH +3.1 points | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| New Zealand | ICSH +2.6 points | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| Japan | ICSH +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Luxembourg | ICSH +1.3 points | 1.3% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (10) | ICSH +5.4 points | 5.4% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: ICSH 98% developed, 2% emerging.
Concentration
- ICSH10.0%
- MMKT80.0%
- ICSH407
- MMKT29
Asset class
- ICSH
- Fixed Income
- MMKT
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. ICSH holds 407 securities, MMKT 29.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs MMKT Cost
Overpaying MMKT vs ICSH
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
MMKT 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | MMKT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $365 | $218 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,421 | $846 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $4,155 | $2,466 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.20%MMKT
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
MMKT 45th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs MMKT Dividends
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- MMKT 3.63%
- ICSH $2.08
- MMKT $3.64
- ICSH $0.17
- MMKT $0.07
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- MMKT Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- MMKT Pays Nov 2, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- MMKT Weekly
Distribution history
ICSH vs MMKT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%MMKT 0.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87MMKT −2.61
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%MMKT −0.04%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04MMKT 0.0008
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.