ICSH ranks 1st and NUSB 32nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs NUSB
ICSH −0.09pt a year
0.08%0.17%
ICSH 319.8×the volume
1.67M5.21K
ICSH vs NUSB Performance
+3.7%+3.9%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- NUSB 0.17%
- ICSH $8.9B
- NUSB $155M
- ICSH +3.7%
- NUSB +3.9%, better
- ICSH 4.12%
- NUSB 4.16%, better
- ICSH 404
- NUSB 140
- ICSH 1.67M sh, better
- NUSB 5.21K sh
- ICSH $50.30
- NUSB $25.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | NUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A91Higher | D37 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and NUSB are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
NUSBB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
NUSB Nuveen's 2024 entry in the cash-parking aisle: an actively run bond fund that keeps duration near a year or less, leans investment grade, pays monthly, and charges less than the typical ultra-short ETF.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
NUSB The actively managed ETF seeks total return consistent with preservation of capital. It invests at least 80% in income-producing fixed-income securities, primarily investment grade, while seeking duration of one year or less, except that duration may reach two years in certain market conditions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs NUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs NUSB Cost
Overpaying NUSB vs ICSH
$1,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
NUSB 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | NUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $310 | $163 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,211 | $636 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,546 | $1,857 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.17%NUSB
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
NUSB 33rd cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs NUSB Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- NUSB 4.16%, better
- ICSH $2.07
- NUSB $1.05
- ICSH $0.18
- NUSB $0.09
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- NUSB Nov 2, 2026
- ICSH Pays Nov 5, 2026
- NUSB Nov 3, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- NUSB Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs NUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%NUSB 0.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87NUSB 0.76
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%NUSB −0.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04NUSB 0.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.