ICSH ranks 1st and OBIL 32nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs OBIL
ICSH −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
ICSH 35.1×the volume
1.67M47.5K
ICSH +0.6pt
+4.9%+4.3%
ICSH vs OBIL Performance
+3.7%+3.3%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- OBIL 0.15%
- ICSH $8.9B
- OBIL $337M
- ICSH +3.7%, better
- OBIL +3.3%
- ICSH 4.12%, better
- OBIL 3.73%
- ICSH 404
- OBIL 2
- ICSH 1.67M sh, better
- OBIL 47.5K sh
- ICSH $50.30
- OBIL $49.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | OBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A91Higher | C44 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and OBIL are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
OBILB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
OBIL Most cash-parking ETFs blend a ladder of short bills. OBIL points at one spot on the curve instead: the 12-month Treasury bill. A precision instrument from F/m's benchmark lineup, and it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
OBIL The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of its stated underlying benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs OBIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs OBIL Cost
Overpaying OBIL vs ICSH
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
OBIL 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | OBIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.15%OBIL
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
OBIL 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs OBIL Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%, better
- OBIL 3.73%
- ICSH $2.07
- OBIL $1.86
- ICSH $0.18
- OBIL $0.18
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- OBIL Oct 27, 2026
- ICSH Pays Nov 5, 2026
- OBIL Oct 28, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- OBIL Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs OBIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%, betterOBIL 0.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87, betterOBIL −0.25
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%OBIL −0.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04OBIL 0.07
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.