ICSH ranks 1st and SOFR 62nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs SOFR
ICSH −0.12pt a year
0.08%0.20%
ICSH 309.0×the volume
1.64M5.32K
ICSH vs SOFR Performance
+3.6%+3.7%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- SOFR 0.20%
- ICSH $8.97B
- SOFR $462M
- ICSH +3.6%
- SOFR +3.7%, better
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- SOFR 3.69%
- ICSH 408
- SOFR 7
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- SOFR 5.32K sh
- ICSH $50.47
- SOFR $100.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | SOFR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A90 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | D25 |
| Durability | A90Higher | C46 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and SOFR are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
SOFRC
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
SOFR The ticker is the mandate. Instead of owning a T-bill ladder and hoping it nets out to the overnight rate, this fund goes at the rate directly through Treasury-backed repurchase agreements, targeting SOFR after fees.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
SOFR The Fund seeks current income matching the returns of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), after fund expenses. It aims to closely replicate SOFR and expects to do so principally through repurchase agreements.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs SOFR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs SOFR Cost
Overpaying SOFR vs ICSH
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
SOFR 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | SOFR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $365 | $218 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,421 | $846 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $4,155 | $2,466 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.20%SOFR
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
SOFR 45th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs SOFR Dividends
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- SOFR 3.69%
- ICSH $2.08
- SOFR $3.70
- ICSH $0.17
- SOFR $0.33
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- SOFR Oct 29, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- SOFR Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- SOFR Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs SOFR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%SOFR 0.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87SOFR −0.62
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%SOFR −0.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04SOFR 0.004
ICSH and SOFR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
