ICSH ranks 1st and TBUX 25th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs TBUX
ICSH −0.09pt a year
0.08%0.17%
ICSH 4.4×the volume
1.67M377K
TBUX +0.2pt
+4.0%+4.2%
ICSH vs TBUX Performance
+21.5%+22.9%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- TBUX 0.17%
- ICSH $8.9B
- TBUX $2.05B
- ICSH +3.7%
- TBUX +4.2%, better
- ICSH 4.12%
- TBUX 4.37%, better
- ICSH 404
- TBUX 660
- ICSH 1.67M sh, better
- TBUX 377K sh
- ICSH $50.30
- TBUX $49.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | TBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A76Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | A83 |
| Durability | A91Higher | A72 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and TBUX are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
TBUXB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
TBUX An actively run cash-plus bond fund that reaches past T-bills into corporate and securitized credit, while the prospectus keeps average effective maturity on a 1.5-year leash. Costs 0.17% and pays monthly.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
TBUX The fund seeks a high level of income consistent with low volatility of principal value. It invests in a diversified portfolio of shorter-term investment-grade corporate and government securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs TBUX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs TBUX Cost
Overpaying TBUX vs ICSH
$1,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
TBUX 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | TBUX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $310 | $163 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,211 | $636 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,546 | $1,857 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.17%TBUX
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
TBUX 33rd cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs TBUX Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- TBUX 4.37%, better
- ICSH $2.07
- TBUX $2.17
- ICSH $0.18
- TBUX $0.18
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- TBUX Oct 27, 2026
- ICSH Pays Nov 5, 2026
- TBUX Oct 29, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- TBUX Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs TBUX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ICSH
- TBUX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%, betterTBUX 0.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87TBUX 1.79, better
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%, betterTBUX −1.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04TBUX 0.07
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.