ICSH ranks 1st and ULST 40th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs ULST
ICSH −0.12pt a year
0.08%0.20%
ICSH 21.7×the volume
1.68M77.5K
ICSH +0.2pt
+2.9%+2.7%
ICSH vs ULST Performance
+21.5%+20.6%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- ULST 0.20%
- ICSH $8.9B
- ULST $527M
- ICSH +3.7%, better
- ULST +3.4%
- ICSH 4.12%
- ULST 4.15%, better
- ICSH 400
- ULST 276
- ICSH 1.68M sh, better
- ULST 77.5K sh
- ICSH $50.35
- ULST $40.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | ULST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D39 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A90Higher | A78 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and ULST are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
ULSTB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
ULST The active option in a category full of index trackers: State Street's managers hand-pick roughly 300 short, high-quality bonds to squeeze income out of cash-adjacent money, and pay it out monthly.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
ULST ULST seeks to maximize current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity through short-duration, high-quality investments. It is actively managed and invests in securities somewhat longer-term than traditional cash vehicles.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs ULST Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs ULST Cost
Overpaying ULST vs ICSH
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
ULST 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | ULST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $365 | $218 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,421 | $846 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $4,155 | $2,466 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.20%ULST
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
ULST 44th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs ULST Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- ULST 4.15%, better
- ICSH $2.07
- ULST $1.67
- ICSH $0.18
- ULST $0.14
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- ULST Nov 2, 2026
- ICSH Nov 5, 2026
- ULST Nov 5, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- ULST Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs ULST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ICSH
- ULST
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%, betterULST 0.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87, betterULST 0.30
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%, betterULST −1.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04ULST 0.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.