ICSH ranks 1st and UYLD 54th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs UYLD
ICSH −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
ICSH 5.1×the volume
1.64M320K
UYLD +0.7pt
+4.9%+5.6%
ICSH vs UYLD Performance
+3.6%+4.0%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- UYLD 0.35%
- ICSH $8.97B
- UYLD $1.44B
- ICSH +3.6%
- UYLD +4.0%, better
- ICSH 4.13%
- UYLD 4.98%, better
- ICSH 408
- UYLD 496
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- UYLD 320K sh
- ICSH $50.47
- UYLD $50.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | UYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | A76Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A90Higher | B62 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and UYLD are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
UYLDC
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
UYLD Angel Oak's ultrashort fund comes out of a securitized-credit shop, not a bill ladder: active, roughly 500 bonds, average maturity kept under two years and duration under one year, for 0.35% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
UYLD The Fund seeks current income while aiming to limit price volatility and preserve liquidity. Its portfolio is managed to maintain a dollar-weighted average maturity below two years and duration below one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs UYLD Holdings
How ICSH and UYLD differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country77.1%
Sector
No Sector split for UYLD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ICSHMore in UYLD | ICSH | UYLD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | UYLD +15.9 points | 75.4% | 91.3% |
| Kuwait | UYLD +5.7 points | 0.4% | 6.1% |
| Canada | ICSH +4.5 points | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| Australia | ICSH +3.1 points | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Sweden | ICSH +3.1 points | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | ICSH +2.9 points | 3.3% | 0.4% |
| New Zealand | ICSH +2.6 points | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| Japan | ICSH +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (11) | ICSH +4.1 points | 6.3% | 2.2% |
Outside the US: ICSH 98% developed, 2% emerging.
Concentration
- ICSH10.0%
- UYLD14.0%
- ICSH407
- UYLD491
Asset class
- ICSH
- Fixed Income
- UYLD
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. ICSH holds 407 securities, UYLD 491.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs UYLD Cost
Overpaying UYLD vs ICSH
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
UYLD 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | UYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $634 | $487 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,454 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,126 | $5,437 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.35%UYLD
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
UYLD 72nd cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs UYLD Dividends
- ICSH 4.13%
- UYLD 4.98%, better
- ICSH $2.08
- UYLD $2.53
- ICSH $0.17
- UYLD $0.19
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- UYLD Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- UYLD Pays Nov 2, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- UYLD Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs UYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%, betterUYLD 0.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87UYLD 1.99, better
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%UYLD −0.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04UYLD 0.07
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.