ICSH ranks 1st and XBIL 27th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs XBIL
ICSH −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
ICSH 16.1×the volume
1.64M102K
ICSH +0.5pt
+4.9%+4.4%
ICSH vs XBIL Performance
+3.6%+3.7%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- XBIL 0.15%
- ICSH $8.97B
- XBIL $792M
- ICSH +3.6%
- XBIL +3.7%, better
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- XBIL 4.00%
- ICSH 408
- XBIL 2
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- XBIL 102K sh
- ICSH $50.47
- XBIL $50.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | XBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A90Higher | B62 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and XBIL are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
XBILB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
XBIL Most cash-parking ETFs hold a basket of bills. XBIL holds one: the newest 6-month Treasury, rolled every month. Pinpoint exposure to a single spot on the yield curve, in a wrapper that pays monthly.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
XBIL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index. It is a passively managed ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs XBIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs XBIL Cost
Overpaying XBIL vs ICSH
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
XBIL 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | XBIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.15%XBIL
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
XBIL 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs XBIL Dividends
- ICSH 4.13%, better
- XBIL 4.00%
- ICSH $2.08
- XBIL $2.00
- ICSH $0.17
- XBIL $0.17
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- XBIL Oct 27, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- XBIL Oct 28, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- XBIL Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs XBIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%XBIL 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87, betterXBIL −0.52
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%XBIL −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04XBIL 0.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.