IJUN ranks 12th and IDJN 20th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IDJN vs IJUN
0.0%by weight
IDJN −0.55pt a year
0.30%0.85%
IJUN 43.6×the volume
25811.3K
IDJN vs IJUN Performance
−1.8%−1.6%
- IDJN 0.30%, better
- IJUN 0.85%
- IDJN $2M
- IJUN $63M
- IDJN
- IJUN +10.5%
- IDJN 4
- IJUN 3
- IDJN 258 sh
- IJUN 11.3K sh, better
- IDJN $24.91
- IJUN $30.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IDJN | IJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | F3 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F11 | C51Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IDJN and IJUN are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IDJNC
IJUNC
In short
IJUN Buffer ETFs are mostly an S&P 500 game. IJUN runs the playbook abroad: it tracks the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, absorbs the first 15% of losses, caps the upside, and resets each June.
Stated mandate
IJUN The Fund seeks to match the performance of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a maximum return cap, while seeking to protect the first 15% of losses over the approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IDJN vs IJUN Holdings
How IDJN and IJUN differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Country99.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in IDJNMore in IJUN | Gap | IDJN | IJUN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | Same weight | 25.1% | 25.1% | |
| Industrials | Same weight | 18.3% | 18.3% | |
| Technology | Same weight | 11.6% | 11.6% | |
| Health Care | Same weight | 11.0% | 11.0% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 7.2% | 7.2% | |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 6.9% | 6.9% | |
| Materials | Same weight | 5.7% | 5.7% | |
| Communication | Same weight | 4.6% | 4.6% | |
| Energy | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% | |
| Utilities | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% | |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IDJNMore in IJUN | Gap | IDJN | IJUN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | IDJN +0.5 points | 23.8% | 23.3% | |
| Other countries (24) | IJUN +0.5 points | 76.2% | 76.7% |
Outside the US: IDJN 99% developed, 1% emerging. IJUN 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IDJN101.9%
- IJUN102.1%
- IDJN3
- IJUN3
Asset class
- IDJN
- Stocks
- IJUN
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in IDJN3
- In both0
- Only in IJUN3
Only in IDJN
3 securities, 100% of IDJN by weight
- Efa 05/28/2027 20.89 C78.51%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 05/31/202717.04%
- Efa 05/28/2027 104.44 P5.18%
Only in IJUN
3 securities, 100% of IJUN by weight
- Efa 05/28/2027 1.05 C96.34%
- Efa 05/28/2027 104.8 P5.43%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.32%
Weight gaps
IDJN and IJUN share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IDJN vs IJUN Cost
Overpaying IJUN vs IDJN
$10,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IDJN 0.30%
$6,149
IJUN 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IDJN | IJUN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,508 | $963 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,706 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $16,199 | $10,050 |
- 0.30%IDJN, cheaper
- 0.85%IJUN
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
IDJN cheapest of 26 funds
IJUN 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IDJN vs IJUN Dividends
- IDJN None
- IJUN None
Distribution history
IDJN vs IJUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IDJN IJUN 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IDJN IJUN 0.86
- Worst fall
- IDJN IJUN −7.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IDJN 1.01IJUN 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.