ISEP ranks 7th and IDJN 20th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IDJN vs ISEP
0.0%by weight
IDJN −0.55pt a year
0.30%0.85%
ISEP 60.4×the volume
37722.8K
IDJN vs ISEP Performance
−1.0%−0.8%
- IDJN 0.30%, better
- ISEP 0.85%
- IDJN $2M
- ISEP $106M
- IDJN
- ISEP +9.2%
- IDJN 4
- ISEP 3
- IDJN 377 sh
- ISEP 22.8K sh, better
- IDJN $25.09
- ISEP $34.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IDJN | ISEP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | D38 |
| Mission | B62 | |
| Risk | C47 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | F3 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F11 | A70Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IDJN and ISEP are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IDJNC
ISEPB
In short
ISEP Buffers are everywhere on the S&P 500, far rarer overseas. ISEP wraps the big MSCI EAFE developed-markets fund and absorbs the first 15% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each September, with upside capped in return.
Stated mandate
ISEP The fund seeks defined-outcome exposure to the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA), providing upside participation up to a cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IDJN vs ISEP Holdings
How IDJN and ISEP differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IDJN and 0.0% of ISEP.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ISEP.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IDJNMore in ISEP | IDJN | ISEP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Same weight | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Germany | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| France | Same weight | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Australia | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Spain | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (17) | Same weight | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Outside the US: IDJN 99% developed, 1% emerging. ISEP 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IDJN101.5%
- ISEP102.6%
- IDJN3
- ISEP3
Asset class
- IDJN
- Equity
- ISEP
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IDJN3
- In both0
- Only in ISEP3
Only in IDJN
3 securities, 100% of IDJN by weight
- Efa 05/28/2027 20.89 C79.38%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 05/31/202716.90%
- Efa 05/28/2027 104.44 P4.11%
Only in ISEP
3 securities, 100% of ISEP by weight
- Efa 08/31/2027 1.07 C95.77%
- Efa 08/31/2027 107.45 P6.53%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.27%
Weight gaps
IDJN and ISEP share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IDJN vs ISEP Cost
Overpaying ISEP vs IDJN
$10,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IDJN 0.30%
$6,149
ISEP 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IDJN | ISEP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,508 | $963 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,706 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $16,199 | $10,050 |
- 0.30%IDJN, cheaper
- 0.85%ISEP
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
IDJN cheapest of 26 funds
ISEP 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IDJN vs ISEP Dividends
- IDJN None
- ISEP None
Distribution history
IDJN vs ISEP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IDJN ISEP 7.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IDJN ISEP 1.09
- Worst fall
- IDJN ISEP −7.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IDJN 1.01ISEP 0.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.