QBIV ranks 7th and IDJN 20th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IDJN vs QBIV
0.0%by weight
IDJN −0.44pt a year
0.30%0.74%
QBIV 3.9×the volume
3771.45K
IDJN vs QBIV Performance
−1.0%−1.9%
- IDJN 0.30%, better
- QBIV 0.74%
- IDJN $2M
- QBIV $9M
- IDJN 4
- QBIV 3
- IDJN 377 sh
- QBIV 1.45K sh, better
- IDJN $25.09
- QBIV $26.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IDJN | QBIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A78 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | F3 | F19Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | F11 | F22Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IDJN and QBIV are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
IDJN vs QBIV Holdings
How IDJN and QBIV differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IDJN and 0.0% of QBIV.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in IDJNMore in QBIV | IDJN | QBIV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | Same weight | 26.1% | 26.1% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 18.7% | 18.7% |
| Technology | Same weight | 12.0% | 12.0% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 10.1% | 10.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Materials | Same weight | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Communication | Same weight | 4.7% | 4.7% |
| Energy | Same weight | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IDJNMore in QBIV | IDJN | QBIV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Same weight | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Germany | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| France | Same weight | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Australia | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Spain | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (17) | Same weight | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Outside the US: IDJN 99% developed, 1% emerging. QBIV 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IDJN101.5%
- QBIV101.7%
- IDJN3
- QBIV2
Asset class
- IDJN
- Equity
- QBIV
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IDJN3
- In both0
- Only in QBIV2
Only in IDJN
3 securities, 100% of IDJN by weight
- Efa 05/28/2027 20.89 C79.38%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.5% 05/31/202716.90%
- Efa 05/28/2027 104.44 P4.11%
Only in QBIV
2 securities, 100% of QBIV by weight
- Efa 12/31/2026 0.77 C98.87%
- Efa 12/31/2026 103.90 P2.30%
Weight gaps
IDJN and QBIV share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IDJN vs QBIV Cost
Overpaying QBIV vs IDJN
$8,158
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IDJN 0.30%
$6,149
QBIV 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IDJN | QBIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,319 | $774 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,015 | $2,902 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $14,307 | $8,158 |
- 0.30%IDJN, cheaper
- 0.74%QBIV
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
IDJN cheapest of 26 funds
QBIV 6th cheapest of 26 funds
IDJN vs QBIV Dividends
- IDJN None
- QBIV None
Distribution history
IDJN vs QBIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- IDJN 1.01QBIV 0.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.