SKOR ranks 4th and IGCB 38th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
IGCB vs SKOR
SKOR −0.20pt a year
0.35%0.15%
SKOR 25.6×the volume
5.88K150K
IGCB vs SKOR Performance
−0.5%+1.1%
- IGCB 0.35%
- SKOR 0.15%, better
- IGCB $36M
- SKOR $1.07B
- IGCB −0.5%
- SKOR +1.1%, better
- IGCB 4.69%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- IGCB 409
- SKOR 1344
- IGCB 5.88K sh
- SKOR 150K sh, better
- IGCB $44.29
- SKOR $47.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGCB | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A77 | A93Higher |
| Risk | F24 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | D26 | A77Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A76Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. IGCB and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGCBC
SKORA
In short
IGCB Most investment-grade corporate bond ETFs just buy the index. IGCB hires a human: an active manager picking bonds issue by issue across roughly 400 US corporate names, with income paid monthly.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
IGCB The fund is actively managed and seeks long-term total return through a diversified portfolio of investment-grade corporate bonds. Its process emphasizes fundamental research and issue selection.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGCB vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGCB vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying IGCB vs SKOR
$3,989
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGCB 0.35%
$7,126
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGCB | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $274 | $360 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $1,071 | $1,383 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $3,137 | $3,989 |
- 0.35%IGCB
- 0.15%SKOR, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
IGCB 33rd cheapest of 49 funds
IGCB vs SKOR Dividends
- IGCB 4.69%
- SKOR 4.77%, better
- IGCB $2.08
- SKOR $2.26
- IGCB $0.18
- SKOR $0.20
- IGCB Nov 2, 2026
- SKOR Nov 2, 2026
- IGCB Nov 4, 2026
- SKOR Nov 6, 2026
- IGCB Monthly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
IGCB vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGCB 4.6%SKOR 4.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGCB −0.38SKOR 0.44
- Worst fall
- IGCB −5.1%SKOR −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IGCB 1.19SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.