ILCV ranks 2nd and ONEO 18th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs ONEO
ILCV −0.16pt a year
0.04%0.20%
ILCV 55.8×the volume
24.4K437
ILCV +0.3pt
+12.3%+12.0%
ILCV vs ONEO Performance
+81.1%+60.1%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- ONEO 0.20%
- ILCV $1.37B
- ONEO $31M
- ILCV +21.0%
- ONEO +22.5%, better
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- ONEO 1.23%
- ILCV 375
- ONEO 934
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- ONEO 437 sh
- ILCV $109.27
- ONEO $155.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | ONEO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A82 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | D39 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and ONEO are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
ONEOA
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
ONEO Momentum with a chaperone. ONEO's index chases the market's winners but runs them through quality and value screens first, then spreads the bet across roughly 900 large caps instead of a narrow hot-stock slice.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
ONEO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs ONEO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs ONEO Cost
Overpaying ONEO vs ILCV
$3,306
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
ONEO 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | ONEO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $365 | $292 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,421 | $1,133 |
| 30 | $849 | $4,155 | $3,306 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.20%ONEO
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
ONEO 30th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs ONEO Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- ONEO 1.23%
- ILCV $1.65
- ONEO $1.89
- ILCV $0.42
- ONEO $0.49
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- ONEO Sep 21, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- ONEO Sep 23, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- ONEO Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs ONEO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- ONEO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterONEO 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterONEO 1.16
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterONEO −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82ONEO 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.