IMF ranks 1st and ISMF 3rd of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
IMF vs ISMF
0.0%by weight
IMF −0.15pt a year
0.65%0.80%
ISMF 2.7×the volume
8.68K23.4K
IMF vs ISMF Performance
+20.8%+12.1%
- IMF 0.65%, better
- ISMF 0.80%
- IMF $306M
- ISMF $37M
- IMF +20.8%, better
- ISMF +12.1%
- IMF 17
- ISMF 17
- IMF 8.68K sh
- ISMF 23.4K sh, better
- IMF $52.84
- ISMF $28.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMF | ISMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | B63 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A82Higher | A81 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68Higher | C46 |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. IMF and ISMF are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
IMF vs ISMF Holdings
How IMF and ISMF differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IMF and 0.0% of ISMF.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector89.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in IMFMore in ISMF | IMF | ISMF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | IMF +5.6 points | 15.8% | 10.2% |
| Consumer Staples | ISMF +3.8 points | 4.6% | 8.4% |
| Technology | IMF +3.0 points | 17.4% | 14.4% |
| Energy | ISMF +2.7 points | 7.5% | 10.2% |
| Materials | ISMF +2.5 points | 5.9% | 8.4% |
| Financials | IMF +1.3 points | 27.7% | 26.4% |
| Communication | ISMF +1.1 points | 3.7% | 4.8% |
| Health Care | ISMF +0.7 points | 6.4% | 7.1% |
| Real Estate | IMF +0.4 points | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | IMF +0.3 points | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Utilities | IMF +0.2 points | 3.5% | 3.3% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for IMF.
Concentration
- IMF162.8%
- ISMF103.8%
- IMF1
- ISMF10
Asset class
- IMF
- Alternatives
- ISMF
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in IMF1
- In both0
- Only in ISMF10
Only in IMF
1 security, 71.2% of IMF by weight
- Invesco Premier US Government Money Portfolio71.18%
Only in ISMF
10 securities, 95.7% of ISMF by weight
- Treasury Bill 01/21/2027 (Tbill)92.02%
- Cad/Usd 12/16/2026 (Cad)0.90%
- Eur/Usd 12/16/2026 (Eur)0.80%
- Nok/Eur 12/16/2026 (Nok)0.73%
- Nzd/Usd 12/16/2026 (Nzd)0.43%
- Jpy/Usd 12/16/2026 (Jpy)0.42%
- Twd/Usd 12/16/2026 (Twd)0.30%
- Inr/Usd 12/16/2026 (Inr)0.14%
- Eur/Usd 11/02/2026 (Eur)0.00%
- Aud/Usd 11/02/2026 (Aud)0.00%
Weight gaps
IMF and ISMF share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMF vs ISMF Cost
Overpaying ISMF vs IMF
$2,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMF 0.65%
$12,717
ISMF 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMF | ISMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,422 | $259 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $5,393 | $953 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $15,346 | $2,629 |
- 0.65%IMF, cheaper
- 0.80%ISMF
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
IMF 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
ISMF 5th cheapest of 14 funds
IMF vs ISMF Dividends
- IMF $0.46
- ISMF $1.64
- IMF Dec 22, 2025
- ISMF Dec 16, 2025
- IMF Dec 26, 2025
- ISMF Dec 19, 2025
- IMF Irregular
- ISMF Irregular
Distribution history
IMF vs ISMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMF 11.8%ISMF 6.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMF 0.16ISMF 1.10
- Worst fall
- IMF −15.1%ISMF −4.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IMF 0.09ISMF 0.23
IMF and ISMF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

