IMF ranks 1st and MATE 12th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
IMF vs MATE
IMF −0.32pt a year
0.65%0.97%
MATE 1.5×the volume
8.68K12.8K
IMF vs MATE Performance
+15.0%+20.3%
- IMF 0.65%, better
- MATE 0.97%
- IMF $306M
- MATE $40M
- IMF +20.8%
- MATE
- IMF 17
- MATE 20
- IMF 8.68K sh
- MATE 12.8K sh, better
- IMF $52.84
- MATE $31.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMF | MATE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F20 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A82Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68Higher | F22 |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. IMF and MATE are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
IMF vs MATE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMF vs MATE Cost
Overpaying MATE vs IMF
$5,481
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMF 0.65%
$12,717
MATE 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMF | MATE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,712 | $549 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $6,443 | $2,003 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $18,198 | $5,481 |
- 0.65%IMF, cheaper
- 0.97%MATE
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
IMF 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
MATE 10th cheapest of 14 funds
IMF vs MATE Dividends
- IMF
- MATE None
- IMF $0.46
- MATE
- IMF Dec 22, 2025
- MATE
- IMF Dec 26, 2025
- MATE
- IMF Irregular
- MATE
Distribution history
IMF vs MATE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMF 11.8%MATE
- Return per unit of risk
- IMF 0.16MATE
- Worst fall
- IMF −15.1%MATE
- Market sensitivity
- IMF 0.09MATE 1.21
IMF and MATE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
