INKM ranks 3rd and JFLI 9th of 14 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
INKM vs JFLI
INKM −0.01pt a year
0.50%0.51%
INKM 2.6×the volume
13.5K5.27K
INKM vs JFLI Performance
+8.4%+10.8%
- INKM 0.50%, better
- JFLI 0.51%
- INKM $76M
- JFLI $48M
- INKM +8.4%
- JFLI +10.8%, better
- INKM 4.66%
- JFLI 8.33%, better
- INKM 17
- JFLI 614
- INKM 13.5K sh, better
- JFLI 5.27K sh
- INKM $33.90
- JFLI $50.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INKM | JFLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A71Higher | B55 |
| Risk | A74Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | C45Higher | C44 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B55 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. INKM and JFLI are both graded against the same 14 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INKMA
JFLIC
In short
INKM One ticker, one active manager, and a shopping list that runs from bonds and preferreds to convertibles, global REITs and dividend stocks. INKM has been playing multi-asset income this way since 2012, at half a point of fee.
JFLI J.P. Morgan's multi-asset team put its first active ETF on the tape in 2025: a go-anywhere income sleeve that routes much of its credit exposure through the firm's own funds and pays monthly, launched with a stated income target of about 6% a year.
Stated mandate
INKM The fund seeks total return by investing primarily in income- and yield-generating assets. It is actively managed and uses tactical allocations across bonds, convertible and preferred securities, global REITs, and domestic and international dividend-focused equities.
JFLI The ETF seeks to maximize income while retaining potential for capital appreciation. It flexibly invests across income-producing debt and equity securities globally and actively allocates assets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INKM vs JFLI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INKM vs JFLI Cost
Overpaying JFLI vs INKM
$186
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INKM 0.50%
$9,979
JFLI 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INKM | JFLI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $918 | $18 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,527 | $67 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $10,165 | $186 |
- 0.50%INKM, cheaper
- 0.51%JFLI
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.82%
INKM 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
JFLI 5th cheapest of 14 funds
INKM vs JFLI Dividends
- INKM 4.66%
- JFLI 8.33%, better
- INKM $1.59
- JFLI $4.30
- INKM $0.34
- JFLI $0.34
- INKM Sep 25, 2026
- JFLI Nov 5, 2026
- INKM Sep 29, 2026
- JFLI Nov 9, 2026
- INKM Quarterly
- JFLI Monthly
Distribution history
INKM vs JFLI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INKM 7.8%JFLI 8.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- INKM 0.92JFLI 0.86
- Worst fall
- INKM −19.2%JFLI −12.8%
- Market sensitivity
- INKM 0.82JFLI 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.