INKM ranks 3rd and LOTI 7th of 15 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
INKM vs LOTI
INKM −0.51pt a year
0.50%1.01%
INKM 2.4×the volume
13.3K5.55K
INKM vs LOTI Performance
+7.7%+8.1%
- INKM 0.50%, better
- LOTI 1.01%
- INKM $70M
- LOTI $50M
- INKM +7.7%
- LOTI +8.1%, better
- INKM 4.68%
- LOTI
- INKM 18
- LOTI 35
- INKM 13.3K sh, better
- LOTI 5.55K sh
- INKM $34.00
- LOTI $26.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INKM | LOTI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | D29 |
| Mission | A71 | A90Higher |
| Risk | A71Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | C47 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A70Higher | F21 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. INKM and LOTI are both graded against the same 15 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INKMA
LOTIB
In short
INKM One ticker, one active manager, and a shopping list that runs from bonds and preferreds to convertibles, global REITs and dividend stocks. INKM has been playing multi-asset income this way since 2012, at half a point of fee.
LOTI Most multi-asset income funds pick an allocation and sit still. LOTI hands the dial to an active manager who shifts between dividend-paying stocks and bond funds as conditions change, and pays out monthly.
Stated mandate
INKM The fund seeks total return by investing primarily in income- and yield-generating assets. It is actively managed and uses tactical allocations across bonds, convertible and preferred securities, global REITs, and domestic and international dividend-focused equities.
LOTI The Fund seeks current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INKM vs LOTI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INKM vs LOTI Cost
Overpaying LOTI vs INKM
$8,871
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INKM 0.50%
$9,979
LOTI 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INKM | LOTI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,780 | $880 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,686 | $3,226 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $18,850 | $8,871 |
- 0.50%INKM, cheaper
- 1.01%LOTI
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.71%
INKM 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
LOTI 11th cheapest of 15 funds
INKM vs LOTI Dividends
- INKM 4.68%
- LOTI
- INKM $1.59
- LOTI
- INKM $0.34
- LOTI $0.05
- INKM Sep 25, 2026
- LOTI Oct 16, 2026
- INKM Sep 29, 2026
- LOTI Oct 21, 2026
- INKM Quarterly
- LOTI Monthly
Distribution history
INKM vs LOTI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INKM 7.8%LOTI 8.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- INKM 0.92LOTI 0.41
- Worst fall
- INKM −19.2%LOTI −4.4%
- Market sensitivity
- INKM 0.82LOTI 0.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.