OKTG ranks 3rd and INTW 118th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
INTW vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
OKTG −0.80pt a year
1.55%0.75%
INTW 140.9×the volume
5.42M38.5K
INTW vs OKTG Performance
+39.0%+247.6%
- INTW 1.55%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- INTW $299M
- OKTG $8M
- INTW +11.3%
- OKTG
- INTW 2
- OKTG 5
- INTW 5.42M sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- INTW $17.69
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTW | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C54 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A73 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. INTW and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTWC
OKTGA
In short
INTW Intel is Wall Street's loudest argument, and INTW is the geared way to take a one-day side: it aims for twice INTC's daily move, reset each morning. Cost is the trade-off, at 1.50% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
INTW The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Intel Corp.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTW vs OKTG Holdings
How INTW and OKTG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of INTW and 0.0% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in INTWMore in OKTG | INTW | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- INTW100.0%
- OKTG200.3%
- INTW1
- OKTG1
Asset class
- INTW
- Leveraged/Inverse
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in INTW1
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in INTW
1 security, 66.7% of INTW by weight
- Intc66.67%
Only in OKTG
1 security, 0.3% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20400.32%
Weight gaps
INTW and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTW vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying INTW vs OKTG
$12,505
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTW 1.55%
$26,987
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTW | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,671 | $1,336 | $1,335 |
| 20 | $9,795 | $5,078 | $4,717 |
| 30 | $26,987 | $14,482 | $12,505 |
- 1.55%INTW
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
INTW 304th cheapest of 315 funds
INTW vs OKTG Dividends
- INTW None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
INTW vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTW 278.9%OKTG
- Return per unit of risk
- INTW 0.94OKTG
- Worst fall
- INTW −85.7%OKTG
- Market sensitivity
- INTW 4.26OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.55% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.55% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.