Skip to content
etf.net

ISUL vs OKTG

GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF

ISULDNasdaq

Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

OKTGANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

OKTG −0.78pt a year

ISUL1.53%OKTG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

ISUL 1.8×the volume

ISUL68.8KOKTG38.5K

ISUL vs OKTG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−51.8%ISUL+247.6%OKTG

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ISUL −51.8%. OKTG +247.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%100%200%300%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ISUL 1.53%
OKTG 0.75%, better
Fund size
ISUL $10M
OKTG $8M
1Y total return
ISUL −47.0%
OKTG No data
Holdings
ISUL 2
OKTG 5
Avg volume (30D)
ISUL 68.8K sh, better
OKTG 38.5K sh
NAV per share
ISUL $19.67
OKTG $53.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ISUL: Cost 3, Risk 58, Mission 94, Tradability 75, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. OKTG: Cost 70, Risk 76, Mission 94, Tradability 73, Holdings not scored, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for ISUL, OKTG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarISULOKTG
Cost30% weightF3A70Higher
Mission25% weightA94A94
Risk15% weightB58A76Higher
Tradability15% weightA75HigherA73
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB63HigherC51

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ISUL and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

OKTG ranks 3rd and ISUL 255th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 255DGMEUT-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETFScore 37
  6. Rank 255DISULGraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETFScore 37
  7. Rank 255DPULGraniteShares 2x Long P Daily ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ISULDGraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF

OKTGALeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

In short

ISUL ISUL points 2x daily leverage at Intuitive Surgical, the medical-device maker, and resets every session. A one-day trading tool aimed at the operating room instead of another mega-cap tech name.

OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.

Stated mandate

ISUL The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to 2 times the daily percentage change of Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.

OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • ISUL The mandate is narrow and literal: 2 times the daily percentage move of Intuitive Surgical stock, before fees. No basket, no index committee, no mystery about what drives it.graniteshares.com
  • It has tracked that stated 2x daily target closely, which is the entire job description for a leveraged single-stock fund.
  • Leverage pointed at a medical-device maker, a less crowded target than the mega-cap tech tickers that dominate the leveraged single-stock shelf.
  • Built as a registered 1940 Act fund rather than an exchange-traded note, so there is no bank credit risk sitting behind the exposure.graniteshares.com
  • OKTG Costs 0.75% a year, below the roughly 1.01% median for leveraged single-stock funds, and matches the fee on Leverage Shares' other 2x products like UNHG and ASMG.
  • Mechanically simple: it aims for 200% of Okta's daily move before fees and expenses, no margin account, options chain or share borrow involved.leverageshares.com
  • Unusual target. Most 2x single-stock ETFs point at mega-caps such as AAPU and GGLL; this one puts the same machinery on a cybersecurity name.

Worth knowing

  • ISUL The 2x objective resets daily. Hold longer and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can drift well away from 2x the stock's move, especially in choppy tape.
  • At 1.50% a year it sits above the typical fee in its peer group, where several 2x single-stock competitors charge closer to 0.75%.
  • A 2025 launch with moderate trading volume, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with the household-name leveraged funds. It is not an income vehicle.
  • OKTG The leverage resets every day. Hold past that and returns compound, so a choppy stretch can leave you far from 2x Okta's move over the period.
  • One company, doubled. An earnings gap or a breach headline at Okta hits the fund at twice the size, with no other holdings to soften it.
  • Launched in November 2025 and still small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than on the long-established mega-cap leveraged funds.

Full ISUL profile⁠

Full OKTG profile⁠

ISUL vs OKTG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ISUL vs OKTG Cost

Overpaying ISUL vs OKTG

$12,224

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ISUL 1.53%

    $26,706

  • OKTG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ISUL 1.53%
  • OKTG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ISUL $26,706OKTG $14,482

Year by year

YearISULOKTGOverpaying
10$2,639$1,336$1,303
20$9,685$5,078$4,607
30$26,706$14,482$12,224

Expense ratio

  • 1.53%ISUL
  • 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds

ISUL 301st cheapest of 315 funds

ISUL vs OKTG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ISUL None
OKTG None

Distribution history

ISULAll ISUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

OKTGAll OKTG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ISUL vs OKTG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ISUL 50.4%since Nov 2025OKTG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ISUL −1.06since Nov 2025OKTG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ISUL −72.2%since Oct 2025OKTG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ISUL 0.40OKTG 2.39

Popular comparisons

  • ISULDvsTSMGA

    GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.53% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • OKTGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ISULDvsUNHGA

    GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.53% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • OKTGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ISULDvsPANGA

    GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.53% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • OKTGAvsPANGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.