ISWN ranks 3rd and SNTH 11th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
ISWN vs SNTH
ISWN −0.47pt a year
0.49%0.96%
SNTH 40.9×the volume
1.97K80.7K
ISWN vs SNTH Performance
+3.7%+3.9%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- SNTH 0.96%
- ISWN $35M
- SNTH $252M
- ISWN +3.7%
- SNTH +3.9%, better
- ISWN 3.06%
- SNTH
- ISWN 14
- SNTH 11
- ISWN 1.97K sh
- SNTH 80.7K sh, better
- ISWN $21.22
- SNTH $29.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ISWN | SNTH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F13 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | D39 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | B64 |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. ISWN and SNTH are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ISWNA
SNTHD
In short
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
SNTH Most funds in this corner hand you a fixed buffer and a reset date. SNTH skips the calendar: an actively managed mix of S&P 500 index options and Treasuries aiming for equity-like exposure while mitigating losses, at 0.96%.
Stated mandate
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
SNTH The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed combination of options on the S&P 500 Index and U.S. Treasuries. The strategy is designed to provide synthetic equity exposure while mitigating losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ISWN vs SNTH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ISWN vs SNTH Cost
Overpaying SNTH vs ISWN
$8,242
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
SNTH 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ISWN | SNTH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,695 | $812 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $6,383 | $2,989 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $18,034 | $8,242 |
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- 0.96%SNTH
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
SNTH 15th cheapest of 18 funds
ISWN vs SNTH Dividends
- ISWN 3.06%
- SNTH
- ISWN $0.65
- SNTH
- ISWN $0.17
- SNTH $0.17
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- SNTH Sep 29, 2026
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- SNTH Sep 30, 2026
- ISWN Quarterly
- SNTH Quarterly
Distribution history
ISWN vs SNTH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ISWN 12.1%SNTH 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ISWN 0.54SNTH 1.22
- Worst fall
- ISWN −31.7%SNTH −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ISWN 0.58SNTH 1.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.