Skip to content

ITAN vs SEIV

Sparkline Intangible Value ETF

ITANBNYSE Arca

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

SEIVACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SEIV −0.35pt a year

ITAN0.50%SEIV0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

SEIV 12.7×the volume

ITAN11.1KSEIV141K

3Y return · a year

SEIV +1.2pt

ITAN+26.1%SEIV+27.3%

ITAN vs SEIV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+26.3%ITAN+27.1%SEIV

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. ITAN +26.3%. SEIV +27.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ITAN 0.50%
SEIV 0.15%, better
Fund size
ITAN $123M
SEIV $1.62B
1Y total return
ITAN +26.3%
SEIV +27.1%, better
Yield (12M)
ITAN 0.98%
SEIV 1.57%, better
Holdings
ITAN 152
SEIV 123
Avg volume (30D)
ITAN 11.1K sh
SEIV 141K sh, better
NAV per share
ITAN $44.75
SEIV $49.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITAN: Cost 57, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 80, Durability 56. SEIV: Cost 98, Risk 66, Mission 82, Tradability 91, Holdings 76, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITAN, SEIV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITANSEIV
Cost30% weightB57A98Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA82
Risk15% weightC43B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB60A91Higher
Holdings10% weightA80HigherA76
Durability5% weightB56A75Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITAN and SEIV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

SEIV ranks 2nd and ITAN 25th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 2AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 85
  4. Rank 24BASLVAllspring Special Large Value ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 25BITANSparkline Intangible Value ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 25BLSVDLSV Disciplined Value ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITANBSparkline Intangible Value ETF

SEIVASEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

In short

ITAN Value investing rewritten for an asset-light economy. Patents, brands, talent and networks never show up on a balance sheet, so ITAN scores them with language models and then hunts for the ones priced too cheaply.

SEIV Active quant value stock-picking at an index-fund price. SEIV screens U.S. large caps for cheap valuations plus quality, momentum and low volatility, then runs a concentrated book of roughly 80 names for 0.15% a year.

Stated mandate

ITAN The Fund pursues long-term capital appreciation.

SEIV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. common stocks priced below fundamental valuation measures, using a quantitative, active stock-selection approach.

Why people hold it

  • ITAN Book value misses patents, brands, talent and networks. Sparkline reads patents, job postings and earnings calls with natural language processing to price what accountants leave out.sparklinecapital.com
  • 0.50% a year, below the median for its US value peer group. Unusual restraint for a boutique shop selling proprietary research.
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded active US value field, with the portfolio construction its strongest feature.
  • Live since 2021 on a broad US large-cap opportunity set, measured against the Solactive GBS United States 1000. This is mainstream America seen through a different lens, not a micro-cap corner.
  • SEIV 0.15% a year for genuine active selection, against a 0.55% median in its U.S. value peer group. It matches the cheapest large-value quant funds rather than charging active prices.
  • Value is not the only screen. The model also weighs quality, momentum and low volatility, which is how a cheap-stock strategy tries to avoid the cheap-for-a-reason trap.
  • Other funds measured against the S&P 500 in this cohort charge far more (LSVD 0.40%, GSPY 0.50%, VNSE 1.34%). SEIV runs its version at 0.15%.
  • Sits among the strongest implementations in a crowded U.S. value field, and trades with enough regular activity to be workable for ordinary retail order sizes.

Worth knowing

  • ITAN Fully active, no index to hug. The holdings reflect one firm's model of intangible worth and can look nothing like a classic price-to-book screen.sparklinecapital.com
  • You pay for the research. Systematic value peers like AVLV (0.15%) and WTV (0.12%) charge a fraction for a rules-based version of the same style box.
  • A small, lightly traded boutique fund, so spreads can run wider than the household-name value ETFs.
  • SEIV About 80 stocks measured against a 500-name benchmark. That concentration means stretches where it looks nothing like the S&P 500, in either direction.
  • Launched in 2022, so the live record is short, and the asset base is mid-sized rather than among the giants of the value aisle.
  • You get the factor recipe, not the trade-by-trade logic: selection sits inside a quantitative model. Distributions land quarterly, not monthly.

Full ITAN profile⁠

Full SEIV profile⁠

ITAN vs SEIV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITAN vs SEIV Cost

Overpaying ITAN vs SEIV

$6,842

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITAN 0.50%

    $9,979

  • SEIV 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITAN 0.50%
  • SEIV 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530ITAN $9,979SEIV $3,137

Year by year

YearITANSEIVOverpaying
10$900$274$626
20$3,460$1,071$2,389
30$9,979$3,137$6,842

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%ITAN
  • 0.15%SEIV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.55%

SEIV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds

ITAN 26th cheapest of 64 funds

ITAN vs SEIV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITAN 0.98%
SEIV 1.57%, better
Payout (12M)
ITAN $0.44
SEIV $0.78
Last payment
ITAN $0.14
SEIV $0.21
Ex-dividend
ITAN Sep 28, 2026
SEIV Oct 5, 2026
Paid on
ITAN Sep 30, 2026
SEIV Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
ITAN Quarterly
SEIV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

ITANQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll ITAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Sep 13, 2021 $0.04; Dec 30, 2021 $0.08; Dec 29, 2022 $0.11; Mar 29, 2023 $0.06; Jun 28, 2023 $0.02; Sep 27, 2023 $0.11; Dec 19, 2023 $0.09; Mar 26, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Sep 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $0.08; Mar 28, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.09; Sep 29, 2025 $0.14; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 30, 2026 $0.10; Jun 29, 2026 $0.10; Sep 28, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
SEIVQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll SEIV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jul 5, 2022 $0.07; Oct 4, 2022 $0.14; Dec 27, 2022 $0.17; Apr 3, 2023 $0.16; Jul 3, 2023 $0.14; Oct 3, 2023 $0.13; Dec 26, 2023 $0.15; Apr 3, 2024 $0.10; Jul 8, 2024 $0.17; Oct 4, 2024 $0.15; Dec 27, 2024 $0.14; Apr 3, 2025 $0.16; Jul 7, 2025 $0.15; Oct 3, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.18; Apr 6, 2026 $0.19; Jul 6, 2026 $0.20; Oct 5, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

ITAN vs SEIV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITAN 14.0%SEIV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITAN 1.48SEIV 1.80, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITAN −30.4%SEIV −18.2%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITAN 1.09SEIV 0.89

ITAN and SEIV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ITANBvsAVLVA

    Sparkline Intangible Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsAVLVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITANBvsWTVA

    Sparkline Intangible Value ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsWTVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITANBvsDFLVA

    Sparkline Intangible Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEIVAvsDFLVA

    SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.