IUSB ranks 2nd and LDSF 93rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs LDSF
IUSB −0.81pt a year
0.06%0.87%
IUSB 214.2×the volume
6.13M28.6K
LDSF +2.3pt
+0.2%+2.5%
IUSB vs LDSF Performance
+0.9%+13.1%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- LDSF 0.87%
- IUSB $50.2B
- LDSF $160M
- IUSB 0.0%
- LDSF +1.8%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- LDSF 4.78%, better
- IUSB 18280
- LDSF 9
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- LDSF 28.6K sh
- IUSB $44.91
- LDSF $18.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | LDSF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F3 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B67 |
| Risk | C54 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A94Higher | B59 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and LDSF are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
LDSFC
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
LDSF A one-ticket bond sleeve kept on a short leash: LDSF blends income ETFs, largely First Trust's own, to an effective duration of three years or less. Current income is the stated goal, capital preservation the backup.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
LDSF The Fund seeks current income and secondarily preservation of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in U.S.-listed ETFs principally investing in income-generating securities with effective portfolio duration of three years or less.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs LDSF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs LDSF Cost
Overpaying LDSF vs IUSB
$15,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
LDSF 0.87%
$16,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | LDSF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $1,542 | $1,432 |
| 20 | $432 | $5,830 | $5,398 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $16,536 | $15,266 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.87%LDSF
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
LDSF 111th cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs LDSF Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%
- LDSF 4.78%, better
- IUSB $1.94
- LDSF $0.89
- IUSB $0.15
- LDSF $0.08
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- LDSF Oct 21, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- LDSF Oct 30, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- LDSF Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs LDSF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IUSB
- LDSF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%LDSF 2.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25LDSF 0.33, better
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%LDSF −7.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96LDSF 0.47
IUSB and LDSF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
