IVVW ranks 3rd and MRSK 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs MRSK
IVVW −0.73pt a year
0.25%0.98%
IVVW 1.4×the volume
38.2K27.9K
IVVW vs MRSK Performance
+13.4%+8.2%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- MRSK 0.98%
- IVVW $338M
- MRSK $312M
- IVVW +13.4%, better
- MRSK +8.2%
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- MRSK 0.36%
- IVVW 506
- MRSK 4
- IVVW 38.2K sh, better
- MRSK 27.9K sh
- IVVW $42.84
- MRSK $38.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | MRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F10 |
| Risk | C54Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | D30 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B63 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and MRSK are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
MRSKF
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
MRSK Most options-income funds just sell calls on stocks. MRSK runs two engines: S&P 500 exposure plus options on one side, Treasuries and Treasury futures on the other, chasing income and growth while trying to limit the damage.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
MRSK The Fund seeks income and long-term capital growth while limiting risk. It combines an equity-market strategy using S&P 500 exposure and options with a fixed-income strategy using U.S. Treasury securities and related futures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs MRSK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs MRSK Cost
Overpaying MRSK vs IVVW
$13,203
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
MRSK 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | MRSK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,729 | $1,274 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $6,504 | $4,735 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $18,362 | $13,203 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.98%MRSK
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
MRSK 47th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs MRSK Dividends
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- MRSK 0.36%
- IVVW $8.10
- MRSK $0.14
- IVVW $0.58
- MRSK $0.04
- IVVW Nov 3, 2026
- MRSK Dec 30, 2025
- IVVW Nov 6, 2026
- MRSK Jan 5, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- MRSK Irregular
Distribution history
IVVW vs MRSK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%MRSK 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10MRSK 1.10Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%MRSK −14.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54MRSK 0.66
IVVW and MRSK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.