IVVW ranks 2nd and SPUC 26th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs SPUC
IVVW −0.28pt a year
0.25%0.53%
SPUC 1.7×the volume
41.5K70K
IVVW vs SPUC Performance
+12.9%+7.2%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- SPUC 0.53%
- IVVW $348M
- SPUC $260M
- IVVW +12.9%, better
- SPUC +7.2%
- IVVW 18.63%, better
- SPUC 15.42%
- IVVW 506
- SPUC 4
- IVVW 41.5K sh
- SPUC 70K sh, better
- IVVW $44.40
- SPUC $47.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | SPUC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A91 |
| Risk | C53Higher | F20 |
| Tradability | C53 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B68 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and SPUC are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
SPUCB
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
SPUC Most covered-call funds trade away your upside for yield. SPUC pairs an S&P 500 core with a long-and-short call structure built to harvest premium while keeping more room to rally, at a cost below the option-income norm.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
SPUC SPUC seeks monthly, tax-efficient income with potential capital appreciation. Its total-return approach uses both long and short call options to pursue income while retaining more upside than conventional covered-call funds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs SPUC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs SPUC Cost
Overpaying SPUC vs IVVW
$5,377
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
SPUC 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | SPUC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $953 | $498 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,658 | $1,889 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $10,536 | $5,377 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.53%SPUC
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
SPUC 20th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs SPUC Dividends
- IVVW 18.63%, better
- SPUC 15.42%
- IVVW $8.25
- SPUC $7.30
- IVVW $0.88
- SPUC $0.60
- IVVW Oct 2, 2026
- SPUC Oct 27, 2026
- IVVW Oct 7, 2026
- SPUC Oct 30, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- SPUC Monthly
Distribution history
IVVW vs SPUC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%SPUC 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10SPUC 1.11
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%SPUC −29.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54SPUC 1.23
IVVW and SPUC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
