IVVW ranks 3rd and TPAY 42nd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs TPAY
IVVW −0.24pt a year
0.25%0.49%
IVVW 31.6×the volume
38.2K1.21K
IVVW vs TPAY Performance
+0.8%−2.9%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- TPAY 0.49%
- IVVW $338M
- TPAY $2M
- IVVW +13.4%
- TPAY
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- TPAY 6.46%
- IVVW 506
- TPAY 4
- IVVW 38.2K sh, better
- TPAY 1.21K sh
- IVVW $42.84
- TPAY $51.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | TPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A72Higher | D30 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and TPAY are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
TPAYC
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
TPAY Most S&P 500 income funds pay out whatever the options market hands them. TPAY works backwards: set the number first (a 10% annualized distribution rate, paid monthly), then run the S&P 500 sleeve to fund it.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
TPAY The Fund seeks exposure to the return of the S&P 500® Index while pursuing tax-efficient monthly distributions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs TPAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs TPAY Cost
Overpaying TPAY vs IVVW
$4,633
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
TPAY 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | TPAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $883 | $428 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,394 | $1,625 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $9,792 | $4,633 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.49%TPAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
TPAY 17th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs TPAY Dividends
- IVVW 18.52%, better
- TPAY 6.46%
- IVVW $8.10
- TPAY $3.37
- IVVW $0.58
- TPAY $0.42
- IVVW Nov 3, 2026
- TPAY Oct 14, 2026
- IVVW Nov 6, 2026
- TPAY Oct 15, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- TPAY Monthly
Distribution history
IVVW vs TPAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%TPAY
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10TPAY
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%TPAY
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54TPAY 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.