IVVW ranks 3rd and WTPI 15th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs WTPI
IVVW −0.19pt a year
0.25%0.44%
WTPI 2.5×the volume
41.5K104K
IVVW vs WTPI Performance
+13.4%+9.4%
- IVVW 0.25%, better
- WTPI 0.44%
- IVVW $348M
- WTPI $559M
- IVVW +13.4%, better
- WTPI +9.4%
- IVVW 18.55%, better
- WTPI 12.39%
- IVVW 506
- WTPI 4
- IVVW 41.5K sh
- WTPI 104K sh, better
- IVVW $44.40
- WTPI $32.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | WTPI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C53Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A72 | A86Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and WTPI are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
WTPIB
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
WTPI Most S&P 500 income ETFs own the stocks and sell calls. WTPI flips the trade: Treasury collateral plus put options written on the index twice a month, each sized to target a 2.5% premium.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
WTPI The fund seeks capital appreciation and current income through a put-writing strategy tied to U.S. large-cap equity exposure. It is designed to provide enhanced income and potentially lower volatility than traditional equity exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs WTPI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs WTPI Cost
Overpaying WTPI vs IVVW
$3,693
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
WTPI 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | WTPI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $794 | $339 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,061 | $1,292 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $8,852 | $3,693 |
- 0.25%IVVW, cheaper
- 0.44%WTPI
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
WTPI 15th cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs WTPI Dividends
- IVVW 18.55%, better
- WTPI 12.39%
- IVVW $8.25
- WTPI $4.01
- IVVW $0.88
- WTPI $0.33
- IVVW Oct 2, 2026
- WTPI Oct 27, 2026
- IVVW Oct 7, 2026
- WTPI Oct 29, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- WTPI Monthly
Distribution history
IVVW vs WTPI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%WTPI 7.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10WTPI 1.41
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%WTPI −16.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54WTPI 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.